Trump is a Winning Machine

Trumpflake? Lol he wasn't my first choice princess.

But hey, at least you get to cry for 8 years!

 

Like these...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/2...ed-gas-canisters-rocks-to-assault-police.html

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/2...lly-amid-fears-challenges-from-all-sides.html

Yeah, it's Fox. Try to avoid feeling triggered.

 

As I alluded to in my earlier post.



https://www.gq.com/story/bannon-breitbart-impeachment
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...-breaks-campaign-promises-well-help-paul-ryan
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ge-populist-agenda-house-senate-a7905146.html

 

You googled all of that and still got it wrong. "But" is a conjunction and not relevant to your independent clause discussion. Both statements "it does" and "it doesn't" are able to be complete sentences on their own with a subject and verb.

For example, "Does arguing with idiots make you want to stop posting here?" "It doesn't." "Does it bother you that they can't stop talking about Hillary, BLM and other 2016 news while claiming victory for the biggest loser ever?" "It does."

 

BTW, unusual screen name. South African?

 

Spy on cop?

 

or add an "f" and you get spy head.

 

Of course the conjunction is relevant since that's where you want to put a comma.
You're employing the use of two sentences, not one. Not only that, but you're asking a question and using the second sentence as an answer.
Not the same at all.
You're wrong again.
Here, I'll pull out one of your complete sentences.

"It doesn't."

By itself, it's meaningless. It is not a stand-alone sentence. You have no idea what "it" is, or what "doesn't" refers to.
If it needs another sentence to provide that information, the sentence doesn't stand alone.
My sentence was an independent clause followed by a dependent clause using a conjunction.
This is not a difficult concept.


I don't need Google for this, I checked it with my wife, who can give you the correct punctuation and quote the rules governing usage. Maybe you should do the Googling.

 

The timing of that purchase was a bit suspicious. Personally, given the choice of shooting myself twice in the head with a bolt action rifle while driving a truck with no brakes down a mountain road, or buying a waterfront home, I'd have my ass in the sand and a beer in my hand.

 

LOL, I'm happy to entertain you, and others, so stay tuned in.

While I find many of Trump's personal actions, tweeting really bizarre statements and "facts" that are proven to be dishonest within minutes of his tweets, plus his tendency to act like some slightly insane child, I still hope that many of his promises during the election cycle can be kept. Believe it or not, I still think he's a better President that our girl Hillary would have been. With her I think she would have acted more Presidential but her ideas would be a continuing disaster for the US. This country sorely needs to see a course correction away from Socialism, or whatever one wants to call it, foisted on us by Obama and his followers. I really grew tired of any ideas coming from a "community organizer." Obama seemed to think he was running a homeless shelter I think.

 

I'll take the somewhat odd non-politician who loves this country over the polished socialist politicians who hate this country.

 

To me any candidate from any party that stumps on the promise of "fundamentally changing the country" will never get my vote. If they don't like the form of government that we have always worked on then they are free to leave. It sometimes has problems but at least we, the people, have most of the control over it's direction.

 

Hillary's actual policies would not have destroyed the country. She's actually quite hawkish and to the right for a Democrat. However she has a ton of political debt to pay and would've had to make policy to pay most of that debt through cronyism. That's what would've killed us .

 

Hillary (and Bill)'s main policies were stealing money and just about anything that wasn't nailed down. I don't recall any other President that had to be forced to return stolen items to the White House.
They don't have an honest bone in their bodies.

 

That, and well, the fact that she would launch an immediate attack on a couple of the amendments of the Constitution, increase the numbers of regulations on a lot of industries and be a general bitch toward the "little people."

 

Don't forget her "hemisphere without borders" fantasy

 

I was thinking about the no borders thing the other night and came to the conclusion that the only way that would work is if we could face and enemy from off of the planet.

I would bet that an attack by little green men from another planet would also solve our racial problems pretty quick. It's really difficult to hate each other when you're worried about the martians.

 

There was also that empty seat on the Supreme Court thing...

 

Breaking news...Sheriff Clarke just resigned. Is he joining Trump's cabinet? How awesome would that be! The greatest Democrat of our time joining Trump?
fingers so very crossed!

 

Ironically, I just finished reading a book called "The Day After Roswell" in which the author and all the characters in the book are real and is a real eye opener. That is, if it is really true. I'll swear though, the details of the book are very believable. Check it out and you'll see what I mean.