Has he been allowed to face his accuser? Has anyone but the D party been allowed to call adverse witnesses? What “unbiased” tribunal has he been presented?
Yes... and Hilda, along with whoever else was involved in the 2016 Election Tampering Not like Biden stood/stands a chance of winning shit..
Ahhh yes. I wondered how long it would take. I don't agree with your view so I'm dense. Standard Trumper response. Just like Trump... don't like 'em, call 'em names. Thanks boys. Got the responses I thought I'd get. Enjoy the circlejerk protecting the great orange one.
You sure you don't have to leave because your machine is about to shut down due to lack of electricity?
Here's a fly in the ointment.....I mean here's a bombshell! Whaaa whaaa whaaa https://www.zerohedge.com/geopoliti...eveals-hunter-biden-group-made-165-million-mp
As opposed to what? Answer my questions. Where am I wrong? I’m not about to protect anyone. But you can’t honestly sit there and claim you believe this has been an unbiased inquiry looking purely for truth. You asked what due process he’s been denied. I provided you examples. Don’t like them? Prove me wrong.
And I've posted lots of articles and a video verifying what this is all about, yet they continue to ignore facts and defend an obvious sham of an impeachment that has no impeachable offense that's even been declared. Resist.
What you think is irrelevant when there is federal law requiring that corruption be investigated before foreign aid is given.
I'm seeing by this post that you have no idea what happened...not surprised. That is exactly what took place. The investigation was already going, hell it was even reported on.
It's important to be correct on this. The investigation was already going on long before Trump's phone call. That is key to all of this.
Basically all of it. His lawyer have not only been the denied the right to cross examine they cannot even be there. Second up is the inability to call his own witnesses. Third he has been denied the contents of 'evidence' against him with secret hearings that are likely edited by Schiff & Co from the real statements. Shoot under the current rules if he was stupid enough to testify the Republicans would be limited by current rules on what they could ask. Salem held more even handed prosecutions.
Oh please you act like the Democrats are not constantly name calling also. Now I gave you a polite and complete response on due process are you going to dispute it on fact or change the subject? Because I doubt you will admit that he is getting denied due process
If he is lying about the commander in chief then yes, he would be a traitor. So those who think he is lying calling him a traitor make perfect sense. Decorations don't mean a thing with regard to his opinion about US foreign policy or his testimony about a phone call that he didn't like. What I saw of his opinions sure seemed like they were pure OMB and based in large part on his personal belief of old school political deal making. Which as we can all agree is not how Trump does things. Him not liking what Trump said is fine, him daring to call what happened illegal and such was just more bullshit. Not his call to make.