Going by final results, it’s mixed isn’t? I think pretty close to the top of his game. No doubt the time spent with Ducati wasn’t very productive. It also reinforces what at times we all seem to forget and take for granted is that MOTOGP is freaking hard and the entire grid is filled with phenomenal riders. Sounds like a complete obvious statement but race after race, season after season of watching racing at such high levels, I think we all have a tendency to become sort of numb to just how competitive it actually is. So even at a time when a rider may seem to be a little off as whitnessed by 7th or 5th place finish, it’s still damn impressive and the skill level high. I’m just hoping Rossi, Dovi, Pedro, JLo and Mav can give MM a good run for the title. We’ve all seen how another MM can make a race series a little less entertaining from winning all the time.
Colin Fucking Edward used to swear a lot, even on TV, therefore making him a genius. That's why his claim that #46 was the GOAT is to be held as extremely trustworthy.
I think you read too much into the question. I was just asking if you thought he was at his peak during that time, since you think he hasn't been in the past few years.
Even including Stoner in that conversation is hilarious. Two championships across all classes in 11 years. Great career, but not even in the running for all-time. Oh wait, he won on a Ducati. So did Loris Capirossi, because the Ducati was the best bike on the grid during that time. He was great on it and it worked well for him. Leave it at that and stop comparing him to Rossi and Marquez. It's silly.
Don't you fucking diss on my spelling, engrish isn't my first fucking language ! Let's see you write in fucking French, fucker