.<---his point ...................................................................................... -->you
No. Both are murderers. White guy shoots lots of black people=liberal cum fest Black guy shoots lots of white people=liberal meh
Weird... How many died when ole dumbass ran over protestors? He probably meant to kill more than one. How much liberal media did that get? Asking for a friend.
But if he got the chair for #1 what are you going to do dig him up and zap him some more? Your post reminded me of the people that were upset that the POSs that killed Mr Byrd in Texas weren't charged with a hate crime. This after they were convicted of murder and received the death penalty for it.
Sorry, mostly tv stuff. And not going to go searching the internets for you just because you don't want to believe me.
That's nice. I still find it boggling that some people don't see any difference in killing one person vs killing multiple people. If you can't inherently get your head around the difference, then I sure can't explain it to you.
So tell us, what is the difference? Is the murderer somehow a worse person? Are the dead people more dead? Do they do more collateral damage? Of course, more people, more families are in pain. But to the dead themselves or to the killer themselves there is no real difference. You can't punish them with more death penalties or more life sentences.
1 does not equal 9 which does not equal eleventy million. Dead does not equal alive. You love making cutesy arguments on the forums and I get that... it's entertaining. But you're wrong. Let me go ahead and save you the trouble of a response : No.
It's not that I don't want to believe you, it's that you provide no evidence. In contrast, I could initiate a search and find the first 10 stories and not a single one omits the count.
Same old silly shit. Dave - if I get bored I'll find one for you. But it's a moot point, you'll never accept the media stirs up racial bias for ratings. auminer - you still haven't shown how with regard to the killer 9 is worse than 1. FWIW I have and do admit when I'm wrong, but you have to actually prove it somehow...
That is exactly what makes up your citation of "personal experience" while refusing to acknowledge that every piece of findable media includes the information you claim wasn't shared. Willful ignorance is the next step but I was just giving you benefit of the doubt.
Every piece of findable media? I haven't looked at all of them, I am truly impressed that you have gone through the tens of thousands of reports on the Charleston shooting. More power to you! So since you're the expert on this now having done all of that research (and in such a short period of time too!) - what is it I expect to see? Please, be specific, it'll be fun.