It's an absolutely ridiculous analogy. No one will give you anything of higher value for more dead humans. Quantity sure, but you're trying to assign value. Of course 9 is more than 1. Doesn't make it of any more value.
Now that is one I totally disagree with. Very very few of the new reports I saw about psycho ass in Charleston numbered or named the dead people. Every single one of them mentioned his race and that of his victims and that race was a factor is his choice of victims. I haven't heard anything about the other one since it happened and even then not all of the reports said anything about race (some of course did).
Oh. Sooo...do they have a fan club? I'm kidding. Some things are just not quite ready to be seriously addressed...not that I don't think they should.
I still think if he would've killed 9 people and had a long history of racism we would have heard about it a lot more. Heck, a single murder in KC early makes the news anymore. But we did have a black dude that killed 5 white people over the summer and we heard all about it once they figured out who was doing the killing and why.http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article170340652.html
There are a handful of news articles if you google his name. This is the first time I've heard of him.
Not trying to keep the white man down. Just being stoopid per usual like most liberals. Although stoopid liberals is redundant.