Ah the WERA forums, where I have to dig through four pages of shit before seeing something about an actual WERA race, but packed with random gems like this thread.
yeah, it does *seem* that at the very least a partial refund is in order. be great if they could work something out between the two of them. theyve had some time to chill, (read the beeb lol) and reconsider things. meet half way guys and take it from there.
You actually read all that? I'm just here for the random meltdowns and name calling. This thing went off the rails a long time ago!
You are correct. However, trademark or copyright infringement is not theft, no matter how raging-hard your justice-boner for it may be.
If you've been ripped off, wouldn't you want conversations documented? John probably realized this after the original call, you know, after having a moment to cool down.
Tomayto/tohmhatoe... Trademark infringement is a violation of the exclusive rights attached to a trademark without the authorization of the trademark owner or any licensees (provided that such authorization was within the scope of the licence). Infringement may occur when one party, the "infringer", uses a trademark which is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark owned by another party, in relation to products or services which are identical or similar to the products or services which the registration covers. An owner of a trademark may commence civil legal proceedings against a party which infringes its registered trademark. In the United States, the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984 criminalized the intentional trade in counterfeit goods and services.[1]:485–486 The ACTA trade agreement, signed in May 2011 by the United States, Japan, Switzerland, and the EU, requires that its parties add criminal penalties, including incarceration and fines, for copyright and trademark infringement, and obligated the parties to actively police for infringement.[2][3][4]
How do you type with that thing banging on the keyboard? -jim p.s... If you had met Chris, you would know he's not quite from this planet. Therefore, he refuses to acknowledge the Wiki's as a legitimate source of worry.
Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit. Seriously? New York attitude? LOL, fuck you and your city, pay me. I'm from the south side of Chicago, does that entitle me to dry fuck people in the ass and then get pissed about it when they call me on it at 10 AM? And seriously, 10 AM? FFS if you're not a 3rd shift worker, get your fat ass the fuck out of bed.
Thank you for so adroitly making my point. It isn't tomay-toe - tomah-toe. They mean different things. Maybe be more careful before you start using words like "intellect" and then start accusing people here of not having it. Just trying to help you out with your trolling.
then perhaps he should call him and record the phone call. if recording is not legal without the others knowledge, then notify him at the start of the call that its being recorded for both of them. sr should be ok with that right??? something tells me he wont be though, just a hunch.
OK mr intellect, if one has trademarked and or copyrighted their DBA, name and or signature then also requires anyone else to have a license to use that DBA, name and or signature, would this trade agreement and "act" still be effective in enforcing infringement penalties against the one who has a trademark and or copyright on their DBA, name and or signature? & shut up dollar store sacko lol