Can we talk about Masters?

Because one is enforceable and one is not. This isn't rocket science or hard to understand. There is not hole in the argument because it is not remotely about just cost nor has it ever been just about cost. The cost thing is only ever brought up as the sole reason by those who want the rules changed.

Give me one good reason why we should allow aftermarket master cylinders in the 5 classes that restrict them of our more than 30 that run every weekend.

I'm also curious, why should we even bother with SS classes? What's the point since every single time we allow something a vocal handful of riders immediately wants more?

 

There was never an actual fight over double bubbles or slicks. The smart racers knew how to push fairing ears together and make the center of a windscreen taller, there was a tiny handful of those who couldn't figure it out or those who got free windscreens who complained. The tire thing was never even a real conversation.

 

We don't even bother with that half the time these days as companies get away from contingency programs but the simple answer is the people doing that didn't/don't necessarily know the legalities of each class out there.

If someone is cheating and whines about being busted that is on them not the person protesting. It's an easy $25 for a visual and you get it back if you're right. If you're not protesting then you don't get to whine about the cheaters.

Interestingly the riders as always running the fastest don't need the aftermarket masters....

 

And I'll win just like every other lawsuit to date

 

You'd be wrong.

 

I talked to some friends in drag racing about it decades ago - the only way to do it was have a fuel sponsor who tested everyone. Even pump gas would test as oxygenated so you can't even really require that.

 

I don't even remember the shock mount thing at all.