Can you provide us the reporting on this topic by someone else? If the answer is "no", are you willing to be real about why?
I had to search the "Non Issue" sign I had no idea what it was. I don't understand why anyone would have an issue with that sign. I can't imagine people that would want to hit a person or an animal or anything else at highway speeds. Per the LA Times, they were all gone as of early 2018. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-immigration-sign-20180210-story.html
Conservative logic comes entirely from disjointed memes. Or conservative logic is disjointed, not sure yet....
I think people have an issue with the need for the sign, not the sign itself. I suspect you know that though.
The need for the sign could be argued both ways. Open borders, no need for the sign. Better border security, no need for the sign.
The irony of leftists making fun of Breitbart and Fox is hilarious when the chew on CNN and MSNBC's bullshit as gospel.
Only for those confused. Just because you disagree with someone or their actions does not mean you wish them harm or ill. Actually it is the opposite. Now you can debate the correctness of their desire but in most cases the desire is for the person to have a better life. That said there are hypocrites (just as Bernie the commie has 3 houses) But if someone comes in a church in need of a bath they can set next to me if anyone else objects. If the church as a whole does not welcome them then I do not belong there either. If the church has people offer the person help/companionship or other things then the preacher has done a decent job. No one is perfect yet that is not a reason to strive for perfection.
You didn't write that with a straight face, did you? I mean, it might apply to you, in some bizarre, twisted way. That wouldn't be the weirdest thing about you. But to make that kind of generalization in here, Jesus…