Considering your article was in the op-ed section, it is by definition THE AUTHOR'S OPINION. I feel like you aren't even trying.
Everything written about the political world today is an opinion piece. Even yours btw. So, my opinion, you’re not even listening.
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2020/...les-and-dismiss-impeachment-without-articles/ Go get 'em Cocaine Mitch!
ABC this week One-On-One with Nancy Pelosi...she sounds terrible. I don't mean the trash that comes out if her mouth, but how she sounds lost when trying to speak about anything. It is like she gets flustered even with the easy interviews and pro democrat "journalists ".
No. This is more of the degrading of the rules that will be used against them when they aren't in control of the senate. It's the same race to the bottom and Knob and Clitoris are in. The correct way to play the game is to hold her feet to the fire to deliver the articles of impeachment. Change the rules and they idiots on the other side will be happy to change them to work against you when they are in power.
If there is no trial exposing the DEMS then we have just been had again. Oh, and they will do it again and much worse. Its now or never on correcting DEM crimes.
Here's the catch...any trial exposing the DEMS, will also expose the Repubs...I am totally for exposing ALL the crooks in DC and prosecuting every damn one of them to the extent of the law.
Fine with me. I would rather every dirty fucker be removed and punished and I dont care what party, race or gender. They are all scum. Lets scrape the layer off the top ASAP.
Who hacked CNN? https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/01/14/politics/nancy-pelosi-mitch-mcconnnell/index.html Nancy Pelosi gambled and lost on the impeachment delay
I have no idea how she couldn't see that was a losing hand before she even tried to play it. Maybe it will give a little leverage to some of the purple state Democrats if they claim the Republican incumbent Senator didn't want witnesses and are part of a "cover up". I think that is grasping at straws. In reality no one knows if there will be witnesses or not at this point. Just like with the Clinton impeachment, what witnesses will be called, if any, will be decided after the opening arguments.
I have heard it posed that this is not about the 2020 Trump, it is about trying to gain the Senate to stop Trump when he wins.
Right on cue, Pierre Dilecto fucks things up. https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/20...s-impeachment-trial-because-of-course-he-did/ Its time something was done about Mittens.