This thread has been going on for two years, and I don’t feel like going back and rereading all the nonsense, so i’m going from semi-interested recall here; but.... Didn’t Melka originally claim not to know (or barely know) Babuska? It later became abundantly clear that he knows Babuska well. Didn’t Melka claim multiple times to have evidence/proof/key information from „reputable sources?“. That story turned out to be BS. Didn’t Melka try to claim that any issues, if any issues actually existed, were completely the fault of a third party not named in the lawsuit? None of that seems very principled to me.