The problem is that Poole is trying to convince you that the press is merely motivated by money instead of acting as an arm of the DNC and that's bullshit. Correlation isn't causation.
I hear you and I agree to a point. Yes some of the media is the arm of the dnc. However the majority is just left leaning to me. So when the arm puts something out they don’t do their own fact checking they just run with it. What he is talking about though are the random articles out there that are way off and aren’t even taken seriously. If you look they are all omb articles of extreme. But the clicks go up and so does the profit. I think he even showed a article where they know they are printing false hoods but it’s good for business.
There is no doubt that there are sites that are just in it for the cash, but I'm referring to the major players.
https://johnsolomonreports.com/hunt...ion-to-end-corruption-allegations-memos-show/ So a corrupt company urges the State dept to help end it's corruption allegations. How could that possibly happen? What if the VP threatens to withhold $1B of loan funding unless the lead prosecutor is fired.
Ya, no shit. If people were only half as good as dogs. I haven't seen mine for a week and a half....it's driving me nuts!
Has anyone posted this yet? https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/0...washington-post-source-for-russiagate-smears/
Soooo. The whistle blower’s attorney called publicly for a coup against Trump back in Jan 2017. And he’s now the whistle blower’s attorney? I’m no rocket scientist. But... I’d say this throws a wrench in things.
Lol Sca thought there was two kinds of cats those that humped up and hissed. They were fun and you chased them. The non humped up ones were boring and he ignored them
https://www.npr.org/2019/11/07/777045083/1st-pence-aide-expected-to-testify-in-impeachment-probe A top aide to Vice President Pence arrived Thursday to testify in the ongoing House impeachment inquiry into President Trump. Jennifer Williams is a longtime foreign service officer who was assigned to be the vice president's special adviser for Europe and Russia in the spring. She would be the first person from the vice president's office to testify in the probe of whether the president withheld military aid from Ukraine while seeking a political favor. She will be the third person who was listening in on the July 25 call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to testify, a White House aide confirmed to NPR's Mara Liasson. Another spy heard from?
For some of them, it is part of their job if the POTUS is talking to a country that you have to spy on / deal with / negicaite with. If you don't know what he told them, you have less knowledge than the people across the table from you. Knowledge is power. Now do all of the people that did listen to the call have a need as described above? I have no idea, but I would imagine some of them would.
So all these ding dongs are testifying to their feelings about the call? The same call that we have the transcript for...that's not a waste of time at all.
If the transcript is the entire call, then nothing really there. That doesn't mean that other channels were not directly spelling out the Quid-Pro-Quo. If there are people with direct knowledge of the communications through those other channels, then I would be interested in hearing from them. To me I could care less about Quid-Pro-Quo unless the motive was political instead of rooting out corruption. If none of these people have knowledge around conversations related to the motive for asking the Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, then they really don't have much in my opinion. The house could certainly impeach based on what they believe the motive to be, but that doesn't come close to the bar needed to convict in the Senate.