The compromises for stopping power are well documented and still debated. Doesn't change the target in mind during design. Stick to fucking at airport motels on layovers, somehow you look less stupid doing that than trying to have a conversation.
And yet you can't give one specific about that weapon's design that was made strictly for human targets...
You're the fucktard that said it was designed for human targets, so what feature of the weapon is the special human target specific one? Waiting...
The 5.56mm round had to penetrate a standard U.S. helmet at 500 yards (460 meters) and retain a velocity in excess of the speed of sound, while matching or exceeding the wounding ability of the .30 Carbine cartridge. A wounding specification...? I wonder what he could have wanted it to wound? And that part about penetrate a helmet? Why on earth would that be a necessary metric? These are the literal, fucking design specifications sweetie.
"Put your hands down bitch I ain't gonna shoot you. I'ma pull you to this bullet and put it through you." - Eminem (and @pickled egg version of how the military sends projectiles down range).
Fascinating argument. Ok, you've convinced me. Weapons are designed to kill people. Can I nominate you to be a test subject in the next field trials?
I just keep coming back to see if @CausticYarn Yarn picks 1 person to help her with her issue or decides what the hell and pulls the beeb train...
Not really there has been AP and UPI for decades. Not to mention that many have long read the opposition and parroted it. Drudge is just a much higher percentage of it.