Yep have zero problem with the $$$ spent on Obama's kids nor Bush2's kids. Now Clinton...... just kidding not even the spawn that she has become. Being the kid of a president is tough enough without making it worse. As much as the MIL of Obama traveling kind of gets me in many cases it was with the kids so I am OK with that also. In Your Corner As to the enrichment of Biden the clause would not apply as it was not a foreign government nor head of such that was paying the rent, it was us.
That doesn't answer my question so I'm going to guess the answer is no, they are not. If they are there as a courtesy that gives them no rights to the material or to ask questions. And again, these aren't impeachment hearings...
Geezus fucking bullshit... I don't give a fuck if it is the basement of 3rd level of hell... with zero electronics it is a gawdamn one sided accusation with damn near zero rebuttle It would be like you being pulled over in Waycross GA in 1958 with a Blonde Haired Blue Eyed White Woman in your car on a Saturday night ..."I want my phone call"...
I get what you're saying but we're not at that stage yet, this is the investigative stage there is no defense or due process when they are gathering info. Do you think none of this testimony is going to come out or see the light of day? Due process comes in the hearing it's self. this a pretty much the Da gathering a case against you. You're not part of that process. after you are charged then you get to put on your case to defend yourself.
And guess what I still don't get to argue the merits until I get hauled in front of a judge. I'm a black man who got pulled over with a white woman in the car. i'm not seeing your point here. It sounds like you're saying one should be able to argue your case as the evidence comes in or as the case is being built of fabricated how ever you may see it. Your Phone call, your phone call is to your bail bonds man or Lawyer, there is no phone call to make he's already staffed
Yet Schiff and his side get to leak selected things favorable to their side and whip up the media frenzy... ok, just remember this shit in about a year and a half when it bites y'all square in the ass...
Oh don’t get me wrong I know that. What I’m saying is if it’s a closed session into foreign policy call it that. I’m not the one calling it impeachment the dem leadership is. And as long as your going to say you are conducting impeachment then it should be done in the open. You want it to be committee meeting fine just don’t call it a impeachment inquiry.
You aren't gonna get to argue shit... you're in a SCIF...(cell) the evidence is already clear and your ass is guilty.. ain't gonna be no trial.. we just gonna wait for awhile.. take care of this all quietly..JoeFrank is down to the hardware store... be here in a little while.
How they label it doesn't change what it is. They're idiots for doing all of this in the first place.
Dude listen to the video link you provided.. the first 20 seconds https://www.c-span.org/video/?465644-2/representative-jim-jordan-remarks-impeachment-testimony
You're watching something else cause they are allowed to ask questions and view documents. If you aren't on the committee you're not allowed in, Same goes for Darryl Issa when gowdy kicked him out.