1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Trump impeachment

Discussion in 'The Dungeon' started by gixxerreese, Sep 24, 2019.

  1. G 97

    G 97 Garth

    Cattle futures says otherwise. :Poke:
  2. TXFZ1

    TXFZ1 Well-Known Member

    Then why not explain it? It was staff not filing the proper paperwork and filing bankruptcy is not a crime. And the whinging ramps up to whining, next we have...
  3. Fonda Dix

    Fonda Dix Well-Known Member

    Just found out our great President will be speaking here on the 20th about 2 miles from my house.

    Better stock up the fridge. Its going to be crowded.
    G 97 likes this.
  4. 600 dbl are

    600 dbl are Shake Zoola the mic rula

    I already gave you that opportunity, you listed one, and it bombed. If you have more, please do share. Just remember, Comey stood in front of the nation, listed her crimes, and then said there was "no intent" so she was given a pass.
  5. sheepofblue

    sheepofblue Well-Known Member

    Not really he is FAR more vindictive than Trump. This is not the first time he has gone off on his own party. Him and McCain are of the same cloth and I would love to see him get primaried and never come back.
  6. Handicapped Racer

    Handicapped Racer Well-Known Member

    The crime was committed

    out of the bankruptcy but he made a deal to pay the fine and roll it into the bankruptcy. that is a difference,
  7. Handicapped Racer

    Handicapped Racer Well-Known Member

    Na, don't even Try it. you said you could point them out please do so
  8. blkduc

    blkduc no time for jibba jabba

    One small correction. After listing out the crimes committed, he stated that he didn't think any court would prosecute said crimes. The no intent was separate.
  9. Handicapped Racer

    Handicapped Racer Well-Known Member

    So wait, lets set the ground rules here cause again here we go with "ok it's a crime but they said they wouldn't prosecute" so Naaa yet when it comes to Hillary she's just plain ole guilty. How is it one way with you all?

    the Man Just paid 25 mill for defrauding people
    They just closed his Charity for basically using it as his own bank account.
    Court documents named this dude as individual one, and you're like ….. Nothing to see keep moving lol
  10. In Your Corner

    In Your Corner Dungeonesque Crab AI Version

    The fact that you can't distinguish between shoplifting and bank robbery is the problem here.
  11. Handicapped Racer

    Handicapped Racer Well-Known Member

    The fact of the matter is
    money laundering is shoplifting isn't shop lifting either but since no charges were brought no harm no foul but again no charges have been brought Hrc either but she's the criminal and he's not got it.

    You've got no clear standard of application. it's just what you feel it is but don't apply it evenly.
  12. Venom51

    Venom51 John Deere Equipment Expert - Not really

    Both fall under robbery. There isn't much distinction needed beyond that.
  13. blkduc

    blkduc no time for jibba jabba

    Since I have no idea WTF you are talking about, I will assume you have me confused with someone else. I never said any of those things.
  14. 600 dbl are

    600 dbl are Shake Zoola the mic rula

    18 U.S. Code § 2232

    There’s one. There’s more, but you already knew that right? If not, there’s no point in discussing it further and you can happily live in cloudsville.
  15. TXFZ1

    TXFZ1 Well-Known Member

    Nope, maybe it try again in english. Are you saying the crime was discovered by the bankruptcy and the corporation paid the fine?
  16. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

  17. Spang308

    Spang308 Well-Known Member

    He doesn't. I've got to hand it to him, he's consistent in his hatred of all things Donald Trump.
  18. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Yeah, I knew better as soon as I clicked the post reply button :crackup:
  19. DonTZ125

    DonTZ125 Purveyor of Neat Toys

    *scratching head* So they're facing $$$ fines and charges for failing to submit their 'Suspicious Activity' reports. Would it not be a defense to simply state, "We didn't see anything suspicious"?
  20. Spang308

    Spang308 Well-Known Member

    I think they were nabbed being lazy not reporting amounts that were subject to automatically being reported. The banks can report basically any suspicious activity as far as deposits, but they are "required" to report anything over 10,000. Not sure what the lower cutoff for casinos was/is.
    Either way, T is trying to equate a Trump owned casino not reporting cash transactions of other people's money that may have exceeded the reporting requirement threshold to the Hillary campaign blatantly violating campaign finance laws via obvious money laundering tactics...with a paper trail.
    It's an apples to dump trucks comparison.

Share This Page