1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Los Angeles - FLOAT Taxi Service

Discussion in 'General' started by Circacee, Dec 13, 2019.

  1. Circacee

    Circacee Well-Known Member

  2. Chango

    Chango Something clever!

    Huh. For some reason I thought airplanes burned more fuel than cars, but those guys are talking about their flying taxi service being better for the environment.
     
  3. Circacee

    Circacee Well-Known Member

    Same thought here. $1250 a month for this is crazy.
     
  4. 2Fer

    2Fer Is good

    Per hour I would imagine planes do burn more, but since they are so much faster the amount per travel leg is less.
     
    SGVRider likes this.
  5. R Acree

    R Acree Banned

    I suppose a moving airplane uses far less fuel than several cars stalled in traffic. Passenger miles per gallon.
     
    2Fer likes this.
  6. SGVRider

    SGVRider Well-Known Member

    The planes are also carrying multiple passengers.

    This makes sense for some location pairs. The problem will still be first/last mile transit.

    The article is disengunous since it doesnt really factor in total trip time including waiting and first/last mile.

    Going 5 miles in LA can easily take 1 hour. If your airport is on a congested route to or from work or home it might be faster just to drive.

    Pretty cool, but definitely not a solution with mass penetration potential. We'll have to wait for flying drones after the Chinese work out the kinks by sacrificing a couple commies to poor QC practices.
     
    K51000, Senna and pjdoran like this.
  7. ChemGuy

    ChemGuy Harden The F%@# Up!

    If they are using Cessna caravans they burn 50-60 gph in cruise. And that is at altitude. For a 15 min flight they will be low and burning more.

    I would expect a 15 min flight to burn 20-30 gallons with start up, taxi, climb and cruise.

    If you live and work near a small airport and value your time this could be a deal.

    Plus aside from marine layer fog in the spring they usually have good flying weather.

    I don’t think they’ll last more than a year or 2 but I wish them well.
     
  8. blkduc

    blkduc no time for jibba jabba

    This will trigger so many CA loonies the entertainment value alone makes it worth it. I can hear it now, "what about the poors!?" "this needs to be .gov subsidized for everyone!". It will become the new train.:crackup:
     
    Circacee likes this.
  9. beechkingd

    beechkingd Well-Known Member

    Maybe they can use the electric beaver.
     
  10. Given the area and avg pay scale for people who this is targeted for I actually think $1250 a month is a bit on the light end of cost. I’d expect at least $2500 closer to 3-4K a month.
     
  11. Two electric leaf blowers and a parasail
     
  12. K51000

    K51000 Well-Known Member

    Sounds as if it's a start up price, no way the price per trip stays that low for long. OK, so you don't work at or VERY close to the airport, then what, UBER/Lyft? Have a car/bike there?
    It's a Cali thing for sure!
     
  13. ChemGuy

    ChemGuy Harden The F%@# Up!

    When I lived in CA (~13yrs ago) I vaguely knew a guy who commuted daily into LA from San Bernardino area via small plane. Much easier commute.
    He kept beater car at destination airport.
    Now Uber would be even easier.
     
  14. brex

    brex Well-Known Member

    Sounds like a good opportunity for our resident car service owner.
     

Share This Page