So what is it? Why aren't the AMA riders cut out for world superbike? Are you really saying that Josh Hayes is a backmarker in WSBK?
Yep when AMA Superbikes were a lot more advanced than now. They could run some pretty badass stuff. Oh and Dunlop Q tires. Oh and kit swing arms. Hell, American honda used to buy bikes straight from HRC. Anythig else you'd like to be wrong about?
I believe spies was faster than josh when he was on full yosh bike and josh was on privateer attack Kawi. Next... Not saying who was faster, but spies was without a doubt on much better bikes.
You know you can easily verify that. the AMA has it all in PDF archives. I looked through midohio going back to 2008. Josh has remained the same since then (25's).....nearly 2 full seconds slower than ben and matt. Just like at Laguna last weekend. http://www.amaprolive.com/live/archives/rr/
This is the part of the debate when you realize the person you're debating is so clueless that it's not worth the energy...
Ped, just quit, your logic sucks. You're comparing apples and anal beads and coming up with pineapples as the conclusion.
Yes again back then Yosh Superbikes were basically unobtanium. Even Jordan couldn't buy them. They were that good. You're still wrong.
I also believe they were on the special 16.5 dunlops as well. Ped, I'm curious, what kind of AMA pro experience do you have? Specifically back when Ben and Mat were in the series? Or are you talking out of your ass ?
Facts? What facts? Are you one of those nuts that claim the moonlanding was done on a soundstage by the 2001 director because want it to be? Dude, No. Accept it.
No, tell us more about Mamola and Polen. The 80's and Yosh bikes. Tell you what....show us the evidence you have the Graves riders could dominate in WSBK....you know with data not feelings.
You're stretching, armstrong. Find where I (or anyone) said Hayes would dominate. You're wrong and the best defense is not a strong offense because you're wrong.