Bull shitting aside, you're kind of on the right track. 1: The buyer of the motorcycle feels as if it wasn't described properly (title shenanigans, engine seals, etc) 2: You feel this is unfair to the buyer, and the problem is the engine builders. 3: Engine builder feels this has nothing to do with him. The right way to go about this is to say "Hey, I'll buy the bike back since this went so poorly", THEN go after who you feel wronged you. NOT the Babuska approach of "This is the engine builder's fault, sorry I sold it to you but you're hosed." You can't go from one to three and have the buyer fault the engine builder for things when it was you who sold the motorcycle. Orrrrrrrr all the paperwork is already filed with the police and the above becomes a moot point.
YOU telling someone else to "except" responsibility, that's pure gold. But again, why in the hell would Rob (or any shop) have to give you cases (and install them) for free? It is (was) YOUR bike. Your responsibility. Your problem......at least until you shucked the problem off on to someone else.
1. Where are the screenshots of these 3 WERA builders agreeing with you? Post them up. 2. Where is your paperwork (or screenshot) where D&D stated the bike was good to go (and be sold)?
Exactly. I have made that same point in this thread. Just like the FBS thread, this entire transaction is between the seller and buyer. D&D has absolutely nothing to do with it.
While you're at it Clarence, I still have a $1000 if you produce the paperwork for your frame. Seems like you'd be interested in that, since it was all legit and everything.
Why? It's nothing new. Read the last 2 and you're fine. Fight the power, kill whitey and pick up bagels on the way to the riot.
So I was on page 30. Started feeling like I had read 30 pages of the most ridiculous redundant bullshit I've ever seen. So I skip to page 60. Sure enough it's still the same shit. You literally could verse the order of posts from pages 3-60 and it would look exactly the same. I think the most recent new development was when buyer without Internet showed up on like page 12. Someone call me when either Dink shows up or this actually goes to court.
This was a virbal situation needing the ok before I sold it. There were witnesses . That's all I need.
You are aware the buyer sent a message through messenger saying he was completely happy twice during the first two weeks after the sale. 38 days later he decides he doesn't want it. I will agree with you that the bomb shell the builder dropped on Jonathon would shake up anyone. I do have to say your post is the most intelligent I've seen in this thread. (Problem resolution )
How's paying $7k in labor for a clapped out dirt bike motor? That's fucked up. What did johnathon pay for the bike? It seems that it was a huge lost in investment if you sold the whole bike for 4K after dropping 7k on it not counting whatever you originally paid for the bike?
If I understand correctly, the $7k was for the entire bike build. I think the bike wasnt clapped out until all of the hours of riding after the fact, even though the buyer with no internet was told it had 1.5 hours on the build. Once said bike was clapped, then it was sold with the incorrect title. Maybe im wrong, but this is what im getting out of this.
I feel bad for the lawyers who are going to have to read through all these pages.....................................oh wait, no I don't....................I just did for free
Jesus, 60 pages and I have finally caught up. my pitchfork has almost been ground completely down at this point. This needs to catch yet another gear, not this false neutral.
Clarence post where the buyer said he was happy with the bike. Post your 3 wera builders who agree with you. Post the proof where anyone at D&D said the bike was good to go. Basically post any proof at all. Please. Or do I need to ask Mongo to ask you.