Andrea Yates found NOT GUILTY

Does it piss anyone off other than me that this sorry excuse of a human can kill her five children, by drowning no less, and be found not guilty by reason of insanity? To top it off, being placed in a mental institution with periodic reviews to see when she can be released back into society? Am I the only one that thinks her right to being alive should have ceased quite awhile ago? :down:

 

I think she should be put through the same fate as each of her five children.:down:

 

Of course she was. Did you expect anything else?

 

I'm not even sure why there was even a trial. To do that to your children is prima facia(sp) evidence of insanity.

 

So is this to say that the fact she wasn't put to death is the correct verdict in your opinion?

 

Hopefully a lobotomy.

 

You speaking with a hairlip today?

 

Exactly. It shouldn't be a carte blanche set up to release people back into society again, which it DOES do in many cases. Personally, I don't give a crap if she's crazy or not, she ended the lives of five defenseless children. At that point in time, I believe you give up ALL options to continue living on this Earth.

 

Peanuts, Mountain Dew AND the bbs too much for ya, huh?

 

She was found to be not responsible for her actions at that time.

Nobody said she's gonna be freed tommorow, she may never be released due to her irreponsibility.

But to force her to take responsibility for something others agreed she could not be responsible for, is irresponsible.

 

I would find it odd if a jury did NOT find her insane. A sane person does not kill her children.

 

Maybe I should rephrase my statement. It seems unreal that she can kill her five children, then be sentenced to a mental institution for periodic reviews to possibly allow her back into society when to me, the only justice would involve her no longer breathing.

 

Does a sane person kill humans at all?

 

That's what I am saying. Insanity in a murder trial means she didn't know right from wrong. I say she knew she was doing wrong, and did it anyway.

 

I saw some of her testimony on tv....either she's a great actress, or she is in fact not rowing with both oar's in the water...


And why is it that alott of these murderers claim it was God who told them to kill..?

 

Because if is not their fault then it must be somebody elses, and who better than a higher power to blame.

 

Hard to say, knowing what could happen to you if found guilty again can cause a lot of people to develop good acting skills. But I still go back to the point, why can't she be found guilty for insanity and still get the correct sentence?