Team Atomic: Eat Crow!

Tests are positive for WMD chemicals. Okay let's hear it from you and RSDad: George Bush Rocks!

 

nice of them to shot first and ask questions later??

and how much?? insignificant?? how come news sources aren't reporting this?? they said just testing for it....

once again getting your news from faux news??

 

No they didn't. What makes you think they did. It's so funny that you think they did. It's a lie! A lie I say!!!!

 

What?! How can this be? Why, Hans and his merry men couldn't find WMD. What makes you think anyone else can?

 

funny, but chuck tomsyck doesn't sound like an iraqi name. hmmmmm, but he definitely is pro iraqi. what do you know chuck, you are a loser, and so is iraq. it fits.

 

where's the proof??

btw.....snowing in chicago....maybe hell did freeze over....

 

What is it that I am eating crow over? I don't think I've had much of an opinion either way regarding WMD. My issue is with war itself and I remain against it in all circumstances.

 

Proof of what? The Sarin? It's mounted on the tip of the 30 plus missiles they found and in the 5 55 gallon drums and 2 35 gallon drums they're testing NOW!

 

yep he's an iraqi alright. he's in as much denial as the iraqi minster. "there are no US troops in baghdad!"

 

post the source.... so it was ok to invade a country without any proof??

 

Try those bastions of the right-wing press, the Washington Post, and NPR.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A47645-2003Apr7.html

20 missiles loaded with sarin and mustard gas reportedly ready for firing.

 

Serious question: If Iraq was as big of a threat to use WMD against us without provocation as Dubya' said, why didn't they use them when we invaded their country?

 

Their publishing of this article doesn't do much to support your argument about the "vast liberal media conspiracy".

 

Ah, the question I've been waiting for. Here at last.

 

Let me have it Big Daddy!

 

Huh? When did I say that? Think you have me confused with someone else.

I actually like National Pinko Radio, it's a great way to put one to sleep...

 

This is an excellent question. I think the reason is multi-faceted. 1. The relentless air campaign may have knocked many of the sites out.

2. The disorganization among the Iraqui military's command and control may have made it so that decisions were left to field personnel

3. Field personnel read our leaflets stating they would be tried as war criminals if they used bio-chem weapons.

4. Using them would have validated the U.S. claim immediately and taken away much of whatever world support Hussein may have

BTW - It ain't over yet and there's still a chance (God forbid) they'll be used.

 

I can't believe that some people are still in denial.

 

I don't know, but can speculate. Pick one or a couple of the following:

1) fear of a nuke down the pipe kept them from using them.
2) Too disorganized to use them when they needed to, and now it's too late.
3) Hid them too well and forgot where they put them.
4) The commanders just chose to ignore their orders to use them.
5) Rather have it look like the US invaded for no reason, meanwhile all the germ bombs are in Syria.
6) The US/ British troops were already sitting in Baghdad before they could deploy them.
7) Ali lost the keys to them and no one knew how to hot wire them.
8) Scared that the US would see them bring them out and bomb the troops readying them before they could fire.

And a crap load of others.