I won't be bothered with signing in to Google, YouTube or any other info-farming entity but someone needs to comment on YouTube about them broadcasting Beaubier in the final stages of a race when he's 10 seconds ahead while the real action is the battle for the other steps on the podium.
Not saying I don't agree, but why would you choose to invest/advertise in a series/team that doesn't grant you the money-shot of crossing the finish line first?
Both scenarios are the Director's job. It's not the first time they've done this in various stages of a race so it doesn't necessarily have to reflect on the final stage. I'm a spectator, shoddy presentation = unhappy spectator. Unhappy spectator = loss of enthusiasm = no concern for sponsors, speaking of which, what about the other rider's sponsors? This ain't the Indy 500 where the winner is, seemingly, the only one that receives accolades.
Never heard of boneless chicken wings before. So much stuff to learn, so little time. So, what's this Lacrosse thing I'm hearing about?....
What does it matter when one of the announcers is Greg White. Sadly, it renders everything else all for naught.