1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Officer loses life chasing bike - biker faces possible manslaughter charges?

Discussion in 'General' started by xtest, Apr 28, 2006.

  1. Steve Karson

    Steve Karson Tcasby is my Bitch !!

    Just make sure you do it Novi, MI !!!!! :D :D
     
  2. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator


    They usually say yes, what's your point?
     
  3. RR_Kid

    RR_Kid Formerly YZF600boy

    this had to be brought back up because...the dude was found guilty...see below

    We were talkin about this over at PAsportbikes.com and i remembered reading it here first way back....well here is the results!!!

    ********************************************************
    James Carncross shut his eyes briefly but showed no emotion Wednesday night as an Onondaga County jury found him guilty of causing the death of state Trooper Craig Todeschini.

    The jury of eight men and four women deliberated for about 9.5 hours before finding Carncross guilty of reckless driving and aggravated criminally negligent homicide in Todeschini’s death April 23. The jury acquitted him of a charge of aggravated second-degree manslaughter.

    Carncross, 21, of Apulia Road, Jamesville, faces at least five years and as many as 20 years in state prison when sentenced by Judge William Walsh Jan. 10. Based on the requests to review evidence and to have legal instructions explained and re-explained, the jurors appeared to conclude that Carncross was the speeding motorcyclist Todeschini was chasing when he died. They appeared to reject the defense contention that To´ deschini’s own reckless conduct caused his death. “The defendant was the one who started this course of conduct. He’s the one who led Trooper Todeschini into that death trap,” District Attorney William J. Fitzpatrick said.

    Todeschini, 25, died when the sport utility vehicle he was driving slammed into a tree at Route 91 and Cherry Road in Pompey Hill. Authorities estimated the officer had been driving faster than 90 mph as he chased Carncross’ speeding motorcycle south on Route 91.

    “He didn’t deserve to be besmirched,” Fitzpatrick said of the defense attempt to blame Todeschini’s conduct for his death. The prosecutor said the jury verdict was a reaffirmation that Todeschini was “an outstanding young man.”

    His widow, his parents and his sister sat quietly in the front row of the spectator section as the verdict was announced about 7:20 p.m. They showed no visible reaction to the verdict and then rushed from the courtroom with other state police officials.

    Todeschini’s father, James Todeschini, said he believed the verdict was a statement that conduct like Carncross’ would not be tolerated. And he said he was pleased state lawmakers had passed a law named after his son that makes it a felony to flee from a law enforcement officer.

    “This is not going to happen again. No family is going to have to go through this again,” he said. But he also voiced sympathy for the defendant’s family. “Our thoughts go out to the Carncross family as well,” the elder Todeschini said. Members of Carncross’ family slipped from court without comment. The jurors also quickly left the building without comment.

    Defense lawyer Salvatore Piemonte said, “There are no winners here. There are no winners in this case.”

    “The Todeschini family has lost a great asset to their family, someone who was by all accounts a great man,” he said. “And my clients are suffering the loss of their son to a prison sentence that is likely to be lengthy.”
    Piemonte contended Carncross was “basically a decent kid” who just made “a grave mistake” for which he would answer for the rest of his life.

    “It’s devastating all the way around,” Piemonte said.

    The defense lawyer said he had instructed Carncross not to show any emotion at the verdict, adding he was proud of his client for complying so well.
    Advertisement

    Jurors began deliberating about 9:45 a.m. and made several requests that testimony and the law be read to them again.

    Fitzpatrick said it appeared the jurors’ initial requests — to again see some evidence related to the defendant’s motorcycle and the statement he gave implicating himself in the fatal chase — led them to conclude Carncross was the speeding motorcyclist Todeschini was chasing.

    He said the jurors’ subsequent requests that the legal issues relating to Todeschini’s official duties be explained again apparently were helpful in allowing jurors to reject the defense’s contention that Todeschini was responsible for his own death.

    The defense had argued Todeschini’s own reckless conduct was outside the officer’s official duties and, therefore, a reason for absolving Carncross of criminal responsibility. The final request that the law regarding the aggravated manslaughter charge as well as the law regarding the aggravated criminally negligent homicide count be explained again showed the jurors were trying to decide whether Carncross acted recklessly or with criminal negligence, Fitzpatrick said.

    A finding of recklessness would have been that Carncross consciously disregarded the grave risk of death his conduct posed to Todeschini. That was the basis of the aggravated second-degree manslaughter charge for which the jury acquitted him.

    The aggravated criminally negligent homicide conviction was a finding Carncross failed to perceive the risk of death posed by his conduct in leading the trooper on a high-speed chase.

    Despite the hard line taken by Fitzpatrick in prosecuting the case, he said he won’t likely seek a maximum penalty for Carncross. He will review a probation department pre-sentence report and talk further with the Todeschini family before making a sentencing recommendation.

    *******************************************************


    Lates

    JON
     
  4. r1owner

    r1owner All cars suck!

    Amazing.... yet when someone turns left in front of a motorcyclist and they die all that may happen is a ticket.
     
  5. tony 340

    tony 340 Well-Known Member

    Question

    If one sets a building on fire, and firefighter goes in and loses his life. Would you be charged with homicide/murder?
     
  6. MarkB

    MarkB All's well that ends well

    I'm sorry, but this is absolute BS. I am the most pro-police, law-abiding, anti-squid, racer that you will find; and I can tell you this is a crock of shite.

    As sad and unfortunate as it is, it was the cops lack of judgement that killed him. :down:
     
  7. jeffrop

    jeffrop Well-Known Member

    I believe the culprit/s that started the fire out west recently that killed 4 firefighters was/is being charged with murder/manslaughter
     
  8. Gymsquid

    Gymsquid Well-Known Member

    Yes. There was a fire in a warehouse out here in Seattle a while back where 4 firefighters were killed. It was determined to be arson (I think the son set it on fire for insurance money) and the son was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 35 years.

    http://www.historylink.org/essays/output.cfm?file_id=3820
     
  9. snair

    snair MOM #114

    as he should have been
     
  10. 600 dbl are

    600 dbl are Shake Zoola the mic rula

    Does the firefighter have a choice to enter the building?

    I'm not being a smartass, serious question.
     
  11. snair

    snair MOM #114

    its his duty to enter.
     
  12. MarkB

    MarkB All's well that ends well

    In both the Police and Firefighter examples, it is their DUTY to chase or enter a burning building. However, they are also expected to make a judgement call as to the risk of proceeding, versus the benefit. If the building is visibly about to collapse within a few seconds then the firefighter is expected not to be blind to that. The same with the cop; if the risks of the chase are too high compared to the benefit of giving a guy a speeding ticket, then he is not under duty to continue.

    Crashing an SUV at over 90mph??........well, I dont know the specifics, but I will guess that this cop made an error of judgment. I cannot beleive that chasing a bike from an SUV is a proven method of success.
     
  13. Hawk518

    Hawk518 Resident Alien

    Only pausible if the motorcyclist crashes!
     
  14. mad brad

    mad brad Guest

    too bad, so sad.


    it should suck to get caught running from the law.
     
  15. tony 340

    tony 340 Well-Known Member

    Lesson learned to law enforcement: Don't chase 150mph bikes in SUV's.

    I'm sure it'll happen again. Just have to give out those speeding tickets.

    Guys on 450lbs of Aluminum are a pretty big risk to society.:rolleyes:
     
  16. panthercity

    panthercity Thread Killa

    Yes.

    By the SOGs of the national firefighters associations, the scene commander makes the decision to send interior teams in based on a number of factors. Among them are the possibility of patients in the building (not victims), the magnitude of the fire, the amount of time the fire has been burning, available resources.

    The standard is; Risk a little to save a little. Risk a lot to save a lot.
     
  17. r1owner

    r1owner All cars suck!

    450lbs going 120 MPH is a lot of energy if you're sitting in the seat of a car and happen to get t-boned by the bike.
     
  18. LMcCurdy

    LMcCurdy Antique

    Yep.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. derby369

    derby369 Well-Known Member

    was it ever determined whether or not he even knew he was being pursued?
     
  20. turner38

    turner38 Well-Known Member

    Its hard to T-bone a car on the interstate though. Also A Expedition has more potential energy at 60 than a bike at 140.

    Unfortunatly the oficer died because of a choice he made, not one the motorcyclist made.
     

Share This Page