I am with you. I mean I would not pass if she put it on me like cortez likes to claim he might... but, as far as "model hot" goes, she is not. She has straight hips, a bit of a belly, an ok cute face, and no ass. She has great tits. Not much else in the "I'm famous for being pretty" category. I dont get it.
She needs to lock this shit down or she's not gonna be at the top much longer having said that I'd still gladly let her speed bag my face with those floppy funbags whilst stuffing her face with a Carl's Jr burger.
Yes, she's soft. Probably on her way to being too overweight to be a supermodel. BUT, the woman can move! Youtube search for the "Teach Me How to Dougie" (whatever the hell that is) where she and her girlfriend are just hangin' out at the Clippers game. Yum. That is all.
To each their own. She is "hot" in the "I just ran into some chick at the bar and she is hot" hot. Why anyone puts her on the cover of a magazine is beyond me. She is not "I make a living being hot" hot by any normal standards. She is hot, in the same way Taylor Swift is a vocalist. Big tits, cutish face. Not much more. My wifes body blows hers FAR out of the water. And that is not bias. And as the tittys guy says, I am usually one who thinks most of you fucks are crazy for saying a chick is not hot. Edit: And that is without the over 9000 hours of photoshop above
It's like people who are used to only seeing skinny models are shocked to find out that people (a lot of them actually) like a girl with curves. And other than Justin Verlander, who cares whether she will or won't be fat in 10 years. If that was a determining factor, high school would have been a lot different for many of us...
Right I dont think anyone here has said shes "not hot". Just not nearly as hot as she is made out to be. And I stand by, my wifes body is FAR hotter, no bias. If having what i have at the house makes me gay, so be it :crackhead: