1 Neocon down... Ann Coutler

There you both go, NOT making any sense. Has she been charged yet? Sounds to me like she just has not answered this dude's questions, and deferred them to her lawyer. Are you saying she should be denied due process or attorney (because of her political persuasion)? What office does she hold, btw?

 

I would like to meet the cops and the DAs you know. All of them I know will tell you that you should always wait for an attorney before you talk if you are charged with a felony.

 

Well if that's what you're in to, Brad. you stabber

 

Jay, did you bother reading the article? Or wouldn't it make any difference anyway?

Where did stinker say she held an office?

 

Yeah I read the article. Did you? It only mentioned that she COULD be charged. Not that she WAS charged. She is under no obligation to respond to this obvious partisan. IMO, she did the right thing by letting her attorney handle it.

Nowhere, but why the outrage if she is not holding a public office? It's fun to see you guys jumping around when you don't know the details. What if it was an honest mistake?

 

You guys? Where do you see me jumping around?

The reason I asked if you read it was your asking if she'd been charged when the article clearly stated that she had not.

Speaking of jumpin' like sweat on a skillet...

 

Obviously? How so?

 

Easy there, big fella. It was a rhetorical question.

 

Oh.

Well in that case, do we need to put you on suicide watch if your Shero is indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison?

 

It's humorous to watch you guys try to make a mountain out of a molehill.
Voting in the wrong place??
Jesus, what a criminal. Is she not a qualified voter?

 

It's too bad you and SV don't have the self-realization to see how pathetic you are pushing this issue. Even if she's guilty, a speeding ticket would be a worse offense.
Oh, but no doubt she schemed and plotted for weeks to pull off this caper....

Towards what end? What nefarious purpose was served by this?

Sad. Really sad.

 

Hardly. After all, she would still be very capable of writing best-sellers in the pokey. :up:

Did you read the Boortz Fairtax book yet? How bout you, Orvis?

 

Not yet. I'm still working my way through the copy of Freakonomics my daughter lent me.

 

Sorry Jay, I have not read it yet however, I intend to.

 

Shoudn't she have to answer this official inquiry? She must be part of that conservative/religious group that finds itself above the law.

 

unfortunately.. (for you) she gets to be a private entity.

 

I think that someone should investigate just who is was that filed the complaint and what their political slant is. Wouldn't that be interesting?

 

Brad, of course, has the original complaint and more on his blog.

 

In July, Anderson said, he received a letter from Coulter's attorney, Marcos Daniel Jimenez D'Clouet. The letter said the attorney would only discuss the matter in person or by telephone because, he complained, Anderson had given details to the media. Anderson said the matter had to be discussed in writing.



Sounds to me like she's willing to answer, just not in a way that plays into the hands of a partisan election official with an agenda.

 

Or an official who insists on creating a paper trail to doccument the process. How dastardly is that!