Guys, try to fit a short description with the picture. It brings up the interest a few notches. JJJerry did a good job!
Here's another from the Mavic Mini that my 7 y.o. hued. I don't know how on Earth it caught that lens flare, but I think it's cool.
The ones at post 89 were taken in 1984 with a Chinon (house brand for a photography/electronics shop in the UK). The top one is Richard Chesson taken at Lydden Hill (his dad owned the track) with 200mm Soligor manual aperture/focus lens. The bottom one is Kevin Fawcett leading Steve Lanyman at Riches Bend, Snetterton, same lens but I think I had a Vivitar 2x convertor fitted for that one.
I am the same way. I don't edit my photos. If I do anything I might let the program that I have for raw files do a little auto contrast correction. Other then that I let them stay the way the camera caught the photo.
I use to be of that mind set, and still am that way to a degree.. now that I've got a better camera and software I try and edit them to represent what I saw in person 90% of the time like the statue of liberty picture that's what the sky looked like that day, and the sunset pics over the lake also. But now for me it's fun to edit and try and capture the mood of the scene of the pictures but also use editing to tell the story how you want to, it's a different challenge but it's been fun lately.
some great shots on this thread Though nowhere near some of you guys, here are some I took. All of them edited in seconds.
Views from Hat Point, Hells Canyon, Oregon. Forest fire smoke hinders a 100 mile view IMG_20190914_131251340 by T, on Flickr IMG_20190914_132358683 by T, on Flickr IMG_20190914_145816935_BURST001 by T, on Flickr IMG_20190914_150228370 by T, on Flickr