Pathetic that’s what that is pathetic and petty. You know what you said. So if you did pile on them people would just skim by and not take the time to find the dissenter so you are taking a side wether you like it or not. But when are you going to stop doing what your accusing me of. Who on here said we know what was in the report as word for word 300 pages every line? Who? I’ll wait for the quotes you so eloquently desire. Second when are you going to acknowledge that we said with the stuff we researched including government documents. We knew for a fact that when it came out Trump and his administration were not going to be arrested. Third now the other part of the shoe is going to drop if they investigate the people who started this whole lie to unseat a duly elected president. And here is a wonderful link to speak on that which we had said a long tome ago. https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/0...udes-communications-of-obama-officials-738876 And since I know you like quotes so much “We based this investigation on a lie, we should investigate who the liars were. “We need to know was there malfeasance, was there misuse of power, did President Obama’s administration get involved in an election to infiltrate the Trump campaign to trap them?” he said. “What we need to discover and we do not yet know: Was President Obama involved?”
Just want to frame this incoherent mess in case you sober up within minutes and try to delete. You win whatever you think this discussion is about, it doesn't even matter. Take it.
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/...alls-for-us-to-decriminalize-border-crossing/ Yeah, run with that!
There it is! Identity politics with no basis of truth. So predictable, Bernie. https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/1114185106623729664
https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019...-al-sharpton-where-they-stand-on-reparations/ These are amazing times.
I'm all for reparations. Every living American that was ever a slaveowner in the United States should have the tables turned and become the slave of their former chattel. Turnabout is fair play.
Wait a minute... Let's expand this reparations party to include the descendants of ALL of the people who were captured and brought to the colonies against their will and forced to labor for no wages. https://www.irishcentral.com/opinio...s-and-indentured-servants-in-colonial-america
There's another issue, but how to point this out without being called a racist bigot? It's quite likely that determining an ironclad genealogy for a large swath of the population will be... lets call it "problematic". I'm not saying that like an insult... hell, my own paternity is a complete mystery. It was the 60s, my mother had daddy issues stemming from the suicide of her career military father, and there were plenty of willing swinging dicks stationed at Fort Polk (briefly) before being shipped off to die in the swamps of SE Asia. So don't call me a bigot for pointing out the questionable nature of the family trees of other people. So, would reparations be simply based upon dermal melanin content? Can you pull a Rachel Dolezal and just "identify" as a descendant of a slave? Would the aforementioned Irish ""indentured servants"" (read: slaves) be eligible? Curious how this fiasco is actually supposed to be administered.