Want stock gearing back

Discussion in 'Tech' started by Jack Brock, Aug 6, 2010.

  1. Jack Brock

    Jack Brock Well-Known Member

    I have a 2008 CBR1000rr. It came stock with a 190/50 rear and the gearing at the track was great. I got race rubber in a 190/55 rear, and the gearing is now off quite a bit. What would get me back close to stock? 2 teeth up in the rear? Hoping for a quick answer. I can probably measure and figure out a formula, but that would take time:)
     
  2. pscook

    pscook Well-Known Member

    The diameter (and possibly the circumference) of the tire increased by 5% (50 vs 55 profile). I would add enough teeth on the back to negate the 5% increase in tire size. Whatever your current ratio is, increase it by 5% and you should be good. I think.

    What is your current sprocket set up? Find that ratio and increase the number of rear teeth until the ratio is 5% higher than you started.
     
  3. Jack Brock

    Jack Brock Well-Known Member

    Thanks for thinking this through for me, you probably saved me a headache. 2 teeth up in the rear wins!
     
  4. F. Richard Head

    F. Richard Head Davie's "Daddy"

    This logic fails my sanity check-o-meter.

    50 to 55 is not a 5% increase, it's 10%, and that's per side, but it's only of the tire height, not the wheel.

    Switching to rad for simplicity:

    17" rim = 8.5" rad

    tire height, 190/50 = 3.74" rad
    tire height, 190/55 = 4.11" rad

    8.5+3.74 = 12.24" (190/50, total wheel+tire radius)
    8.5+4.11 = 12.61" (190/55, total wheel+tire radius)

    12.61 - 12.24 = .37

    .37/12.24 = .0302 = 3.02% increase in rad/dia/circumference/gear ratio

    On the flip side a 55 might grow a little more at higher speeds, further reducing the gear ratio, so maybe 5% isn't a bad number, but still... the logic bugged me. :D
     
  5. Harp

    Harp Well-Known Member

    All the math in the world doesn't make two tire mfgs make their 190/55 tires the same size. Only way to know for sure is to measure the circumference of the old and the new tire...at speed. :D
     
  6. pscook

    pscook Well-Known Member

    Dude, I was a music major dropout. I couldn't even succeed at something that dropouts did for a living. Math is beyond me sometimes.

    If I had typed 10% would that have made it better? I like how you went with it, it makes a lot of sense to me (the music school dropout). Yet I still got close to the 5% magic number...
     
  7. F. Richard Head

    F. Richard Head Davie's "Daddy"

    Hehe... It would have passed the sanity check-o-meter, but then I would have had issue with the fact that the change neglects the rim dia.

    From this exercise, I'd say it's probably safe to conclude that a 50/55 change within the same tire width alters gearing by 3-5%. Once you change tire width, then I'd have to re-run the whole process. No. I'm not going to do it. I'm going to resist. My wife is already making fun of me.

    :D

    And now that I see my article quoted, it's a decrease in gear ratio as mechanical advantage is lost. Simply put, taller tire needs more rear teeth. :D
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2010
  8. Crows350

    Crows350 Crows350

    55378008

    Simply put, taller tire needs more rear teeth. :D[/QUOTE]

    Let's Calculate the vast amount of time involved in this group Master-calculation session...but quickly, time is of the essence. Just put the sprocket on there and run it. It's not that deep. I would recommend a leak down test and getting the rear sprocket blueprinted for sure. It's the only way to really know what's going on back there.
     
  9. NC Jon

    NC Jon Can I change my name?

    gearingcommander.com
     

Share This Page