1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

YTTV vs. Disney - what a PITA!

Discussion in 'General' started by thrak410, Nov 4, 2025.

  1. thrak410

    thrak410 My member is well known

    This YoutubeTV v. Disney dispute really sucks!

    The way YTTV has handled communication has been a nightmare. Pulling all the channels right before a stacked college football weekend was dumb too... the worst part (to me) is they took our local affiliate completely down. Disney doesn't own WSB so why was it removed?!

    Its hard to pick a side since you have a multi-billion dollar company on one side, and a multi-trillion dollar company on the other! Which CEO gets the bigger yacht this year?

    I bought an OTA antenna and getting rid of YTTV ... probably going to pick up Sling BLUE so my wife can get her Bravo, E!, etc ...

    What a pain in the a$$ ...
     
  2. ChemGuy

    ChemGuy Harden The F%@# Up!

    I have Sling....something....so my mom can get her AE, HGTV, etc.....

    The move from old TV broadcast, to cable and now to 18 different 'services' you have to buy to get the same stuff 1 cable tv company had is fkn rtrded....I hate it. I barely watch any TV or even netflix type anymore...just watch regular YT videos mostly.
     
  3. CRA_Fizzer

    CRA_Fizzer Honking at putter!

    Just another money grab from Disney. It's a ploy to get people to switch to Hulu. Screw them.
     
    brex likes this.
  4. TurboBlew

    TurboBlew EeVee range testor and subsidy recipient

    my buddy had to create some fake email accounts for "free trials" of a Tubo to circumvent missing the FL vs GA game.
    And yeah what a grift for streaming... makes satellite look like little league.
     
  5. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    It makes absolutely no difference to me any more than any of the channel fights have since cable tv began...
     
  6. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    How dare they try to make profits!!! :crackup:
     
  7. CRA_Fizzer

    CRA_Fizzer Honking at putter!

    They are still trying to recover from the $5B Kimmel screwup. They FAFO the 1st amendment.
     
  8. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    That makes no sense. No one lost that much on Kimmel and private companies have nothing to do with the 1st.
     
  9. CRA_Fizzer

    CRA_Fizzer Honking at putter!

    They lost 1.7 million viewers.
     
  10. HPPT

    HPPT !!!

    And I'm sure none of them will ever go back. You know, like everyone who quit the NFL forever during kneeling thing. :D
     
    Jedb likes this.
  11. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Truly doubt it.
     
  12. CRA_Fizzer

    CRA_Fizzer Honking at putter!

    Of course you do.
     
  13. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Considering they have no accurate way to measure it that quickly - why would I believe it? :crackup:
     
  14. YamahaRick

    YamahaRick Yamaha Two Stroke Czar

    I never went back. Never will either. Also gave up on 99% of MLB a few years ago due to their wokeness.

    I also dropped cable TV and refuse to pay for any streaming service. I hate the ads on YT, but better than the alternative.
     
    Waterboy likes this.
  15. Venom51

    Venom51 John Deere Equipment Expert - Not really

    They do. All the platforms can and do return numbers fairly quickly. Our system can tell you when they started watching, how long they watched, what shows played during that time frame and how many total devices were tuned to channels. The metrics are way better than they used to be. Particularly for IP based streaming platforms. If it was made as easy to cancel a service as it is to sign up for one then losing 1.2 million viewers could conceivably be a 30 minute event.
     
    beac83, brex and CRA_Fizzer like this.
  16. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Kimmel is on OTA tv - no way to measure it all. Streaming only I could easily see.

    What's funny is I decided to look just for fun. The 1.7 million drop was from the initial surge of people watching his "comeback" and his numbers are now where they were before all the bullshit. So even if they can be 100% accurate, they still didn't lose 1.7 million viewers.
     
  17. Venom51

    Venom51 John Deere Equipment Expert - Not really

    No. Part of the viewership for Kimmel is OTA. He's being delivered to a lot of folks over IP. They can very well track that viewership. That fancy smart TV connected to your network at home also reports back to someone when it tuned to an OTA channel.
     
    CRA_Fizzer likes this.
  18. YamahaRick

    YamahaRick Yamaha Two Stroke Czar

    OTA viewing can be (and IS) measured if your TV is connected to the Internet.

    Regardless of viewership, all late night shows have been losing their audience. Viewership today is about 50% of what it was ten years ago.
     
  19. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Oddly enough only one of my OTA tv's connects to the internet. So still doubting the true accuracy. Is it's a good guess? Sure it is.
     
  20. Venom51

    Venom51 John Deere Equipment Expert - Not really

    The FM radio stats have always confused me as to how they derive the numbers for those. Certainly, before cars were snitching on you to the manufacturer.
     

Share This Page