Three CNN "journalists" resign over retracted story

Give that man a hand!

 

Just got it.

 

Tap, tap, tap....this thing on?

 

If ya ain't got 10 bucks use baggies.

 

Just recycle...

 

"...we are real news" - Jim Acosta , Feb 2017.

 

Awe, him mad. Bless your heart.

 

Never said I was mad. Just curious about the logic involved as to how the only "true" stories many Trump supporters believe are if they support him. Any other news is considered "fake".

 

Dude, we are so past the original story where CNN admitted to lying. Now we are ridiculing a woman who claims she must now go to Mexico so she can fornicate without consequences. BTW, consensus is that that is BS.

 

Hmm, missed that. Have too many obligations to keep up with this stuff I guess.

 

Well in this case the powers that be at CNN pretty much confirmed this is fake news, retracted the article then promptly dismissed the three people responsible for its fabrication.

So the logic in this case is that CNN admitted to creating fake news. It has nothing to do with whether it supports Trump or not. Is it really this difficult for you to understand in this case.

 

Fox news retracted it's Seth Rich story but didn't fire anybody. Never heard anyone say that was fake news though.

Do you believe Hillary had him killed?

CNN taking action against people who screw up would show they take seriously getting correct and accurate info out.

 

It shows they'll make sacrificial lambs in a pathetic attempt to restore a semblance of credibility.

 

Credibility? Trump has that wired.

 

This ^^^^.

Recent study showed CNN devoted 92% of it's air time between 4:00 to midnight to items on Trump. Of that, 93% was negative. Anyone who thinks CNN has any credibility after being caught with everything from fake news to rigging debates, has a cranial rectal dysfunction.

 

Interesting that you juxtapose them with CNN.

 

And then there's this...CNN supervisor admitting to pushing the Russia story even though they (CNN) know there is nothing there.

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...ducer-calling-russia-coverage-mostly-bullshit

 

I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere, as certain as I am that it's not worth my time to ferret it out only to find its conclusion specious at best.

But hey, thanks. Enlightening. 2XIDB.

 

Yes, because one justifies the other . But only in libs minds. Compare the two all you like. It still does not change the fact that CNN got caught making up items in a news article and came clean about it.

Lib logic.