I see, so nevermind decades of corruption, degrading the constitution, terrorizing Bill's rape victims, selling power/influence to foreign govs, killing everyone that opposes her, getting filthy rich by selling out America, creating an incredibly unstable middle east, campaigning for and taking us to war in Iraq, purposely disseminating classified information illegally, denying security for/allowing Americans to be slaughtered in Benghazi, lying, lying, lying, and again lying everytime she speaks...is not enough for you sycophants to change your support from the biggest tyrant that America has ever seen.
blkduc, it is a "Trial Balloon"...just to measure the fallout if it were to happen...along the lines of Trump saying he could "Kill someone and it wouldn't hurt his numbers"...only he won't actually do it to see....
Hillary told the truth!! The latest Podesta wikileaks e-mail dump show that Chelsea paid for her wedding illegally. So some of the Bitch's 30,000 deleted emails really were about Chelsea's wedding!! She just didn't tell us that her criminal daughter's wedding was illegally paid for so that's why she deleted them...but some were about the wedding!
GODAMMIT! That shit pisses me off. How can it be legal to spread false information like that? It's tantamount to screaming "FIRE" in a packed theater. How can you trust anything in the media when there's shit out there like this? And even when proven false, who's to blame and why? Is it a pro-Trump source trying to sway people who don't fact check? Or is it a pro-Clinton source hoping to imply that all of this conspiracy stuff is made up? ARRRRRGH!
Actually, I found out when I reposted it on FB and my liberal whackjob friends roasted me for it. I pretty much responded as you just did... Why is it so believable??? Because it's happened anywhere from 30-something to 90-something times depending on where you source it & what your definition of ""connected to the Clintons"" is.
Think about this for a second. Someone writes up a sensational story like this and then it's publicly proven to be wrong. How many of fence sitters see how the story was a lie and decide that if this was a lie then how many of the Hillary stories were also lies. Maybe the woman isn't as bad as first thought so maybe they'll vote for her after all. Just saying.
That's what I was implying with the second part of my post "And even when proven false, who's to blame and why? Is it a pro-Trump source trying to sway people who don't fact check? Or is it a pro-Clinton source hoping to imply that all of this conspiracy stuff is made up?"
I gotta say I'm kinda shocked at the number of famous black folks coming out against the Corrupt One. http://observer.com/2016/11/dave-ch...ps-clinton-shes-not-right-and-we-all-know-it/