1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

2026 Rules

Discussion in 'Announcements/Information' started by Mongo, Oct 28, 2025.

  1. regularguy

    regularguy Always Krispy

    I would think behind B superstock would work.
     
  2. Lance Molnar

    Lance Molnar Aoxomoxoa

    Wouldn't the MW twins be able to ride BSS? Think you'd want to keep separate.
     
  3. regularguy

    regularguy Always Krispy

    they can race B superbike. I was thinking the lw twin bikes may want to race mw twins so didnt want to put them in front of a lw race. Plus the mw twins bikes will be stout. R9, Triumph 765, Ducati 890. KTM890. I was also thinking they could race with C class...?
     
  4. Greg S

    Greg S #84 Machine

    Run them with HW twins. Or maybe behind Formula 1. The trap speeds on a R7 VS R9 is like 30mph
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2026
  5. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Just because the 10 people bitching are vocal doesn't make them a majority....
     
  6. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Damn good question - as soon as I figure it out I'll post it up.
     
  7. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    C is potentially out due to size of C on most weekends.

    Issue with HWT is you remove the possibility to ride up to that class.

    I am appreciating the ideas, just posting my thoughts on possible problems with them I'd have to sort out.
     
  8. tawzx12r

    tawzx12r Influencer to none

    See this IS how you kill roadracing... labeling suggestions / ideas from the people that pay your bills as "bitching"... if your not happy in you're job maybe you should retire already.
     
  9. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    It absolutely IS bitching when people want something THEY chose to modify made legal in effectively 3 classes of the 20 plus we run every weekend. Best word to describe it. I respond politely to the suggestions and ideas all the time. Hundreds of posts if not thousands on here prove that. Disagreeing with my reasoning is fine. Disagreeing and continually complaining - that is bitching. Not all, not even most of those who would like the master rule to be wide open are bitching, but those who stand out on here with their multiple posts - oh yeah, they absolutely are.

    I love my job, have thousands and thousands of current happy customers and 10's of thousands of great people who have raced with us over the years. The ones constantly harping on what we do because they want things to change just for them, they're not even a real annoyance in the scheme of things. The job rocks and the people rock. Can't ask for better.
     
    mrrogers and John Branch like this.
  10. John Branch

    John Branch Well-Known Member

    I have not raced with y’all since 2002 . But I have never actually ever thanked you and the Boss for giving us a real place to ride/race a motorcycle in a crazy and impersonal world!! Thank you for what you and her have done for so long and continue to do for all that choose to. Happy new year to both of you , maybe this year I will make a point to come out and see you in person.:beer:
     
    JBall likes this.
  11. Greg S

    Greg S #84 Machine

    It makes sense to me. Clapped out SS sv650 that’s sells for $1500 dosent need a $400 master cylinder just to then sell for $1500
     
  12. Hyperdyne

    Hyperdyne Indy United SBK

    V8 or V7 maybe... It fits Saturday but Sunday seems to be the crunch on National Weekends.
     
    TLR67 likes this.
  13. rpm894

    rpm894 Well-Known Member

    How do you know the consensus on the MC rule if you never ask the customer base? When was the last time you conducted a real survey? This is the only place I see the issue being raised, so you can't discount the number of people here.
     
    inpayne likes this.
  14. rpm894

    rpm894 Well-Known Member

    This is at least better than ASRA deleting posts they disagree with.
     

Share This Page