1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Marine Women in Combat

Discussion in 'The Dungeon' started by Jedb, Sep 8, 2015.

  1. Sacko DougK

    Sacko DougK Well-Known Member

    How was the test skewed? I did not see any examples of that in the article. Did I miss that?
     
  2. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    If the females do not have to meet the physical requirements of the men, you already have them at a disadvantage in a test comparing them to men. Hence flawed test. They should have to meet the same requirements to start with, when that happens then you see how those women do compared to the men.
     
  3. crashman

    crashman Grumpy old man

    :stupid:
    One standard and anyone who meets this standard can play. Seems pretty straight forward and common sense to me but some people struggle with the concept.
     
  4. Sacko DougK

    Sacko DougK Well-Known Member

    According to the article, the women had to pass the minimum male score on the PFT. So, they did have to meet the minimum male PFT, I'm not sure of any additional PFT or school requirements. So, I do not understand how the women were placed at a disadvantage.

    What this does tell me, is that the women selected were in the upper percentile of women physically. If we are talking about this across the board, is that truly representative of women we would send into combat as infantry? If this is the precursor for more elite forces with higher physical and mental standards then it does not look good for female integration. After all, the attrition rate for some of these types of units is over 50% for some very physically fit mofo's. Guys who excel in infantry and other communities.
     
  5. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Okay, now read the thread - I obviously missed that part and specifically asked if the women had to meet the same specs as the males and was told no. Based on that no I made the comments you seem to have some issue with, the no I quoted in my first post about it.

    I have no clue what we'd send into combat as far as females are concerned, at this point there are way too many he man women haters involved in the entire process to have a slight clue if it's feasible. But looking at it is a start. The press the women rangers got will help a lot down the line as more females who are not in the service because they don't want to be office drones see there are opportunities.

    Anyway, I still think the Secretary of the Navy has an idea if the whole thing was biased one way or another. Even if he dares to be a civilian.
     
  6. daveknievel

    daveknievel I love orange kool-aid

  7. kangasj

    kangasj Banned

  8. pickled egg

    pickled egg Tell me more

  9. ton

    ton Arf!

    the article mentions a failure of experimental design: "The tests come with at least one important caveat: As the Marine Corps Times notes, many of of the male study participants had previously served in combat units, whereas female participants, by necessity, came directly from infantry schools or from noncombat jobs."

    it'll be interesting to see whether the Marines look to get an exception to the integration mandate.
     
  10. 600 dbl are

    600 dbl are Shake Zoola the mic rula

    If it means anything, men who meet the bare minimum PT standards are not going to handle combat very well. For a woman to just make the minimum standards that a man must meet means nothing to me other than she can do the minimum of a man.

    We had two women on our SRT, both had to meet the same physical standards as the men, which included body dragging 225 lbs 60 feet (heaviest member on the team with gear). Building entry and CQB is a different animal than sustained combat operations. Of the two women on the team, there was only one who I would go to combat with.
     
  11. kangasj

    kangasj Banned

    Dead man...:Poke:. I think I'd rather have guys fighting alongside me than women. Getting laid can happen while on R & R after the firefight...:p
     
  12. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    So you'd go with 50% of the women you were dealing with - not a bad percentage given their numbers in the military as a whole. :D

    Seriously though, the first step needs to be women meet the same standards as men, until that point it's all silly.
     
  13. In Your Corner

    In Your Corner Dungeonesque Crab AI Version

  14. Orvis

    Orvis Well-Known Member

    Since it's been shown that a group of women, when living together long enough, will tend to have their periods at the same time, I still say that a combat Division of women, during their prime time, would/could defeat any standing army on the face of this planet within fifteen minutes.

    Girls of the PMS Division, go get em. :D
    (I am in so much trouble.)
     
  15. mtmansl

    mtmansl Well-Known Member

    I know that women are capable of many great things (and are the equal of men in every way other than biology). However, putting women in jobs that they physically cannot do (Special Forces, SEALS, MARSOC, Ranger Battalion), is an absolute disaster and serves no purpose other than destroying the best collection of Special Operation units in the world. People who think otherwise may be well intentioned, but have no idea what is involved to operate in one of these units.
     
  16. mtmansl

    mtmansl Well-Known Member

    +1 Those that meet the minimum standards do not even come close to getting in an elite unit...

     
  17. GixxerBlade

    GixxerBlade Oh geez

    The Commandant of the Marine Corps came out with a brief statement yesterday saying that he will fully support integration and start it immediately but will not lower standards to reduce our effectiveness.
     
  18. Mongo

    Mongo Administrator

    Which is exactly how it should be. Let them try - just like all soldiers - and let them fail if they can't meet the requirements.
     
  19. In Your Corner

    In Your Corner Dungeonesque Crab AI Version

    Does anyone seriously believe that the forces behind this will settle for no successful candidates?
    Accommodations will be made; they always are.
     
  20. GixxerBlade

    GixxerBlade Oh geez

    Yeah but the women will end up in the company office or as a supply clerk as to not reduce effectiveness should someone "make it"
     

Share This Page