The unofficial official "SMMFH" thread

Video removed by the leftist scum at youtube and wiki deleted by the leftist at wikipedia.

 

Damn...can't even use the incognito work around like you can on other sites.

 

Wow.....this is like a SMMFH post topic completely unto itself as well.

Just a few years ago I couldn't even imagine we'd be here right now....in THIS country. With a fascist left agenda literally silencing opinions that they don't agree with. Absolutely shameful.


https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=clown world

 

Freedom of speech
Freedom of press

....all that lip service. I guess its because its gotten so blatant to the point they don't care in the least. I know there's always been censorship I just think it's becoming broader reaching now. I guess as information becomes more broadly available so too does someone trying to censor it.

 

https://www.axios.com/axios-hbo-pol...ism-f70bf87e-34fd-4b63-b1f6-2f2b6900f634.html

• 55% of women between 18 and 54 would prefer to live in a socialist country than a capitalist country.
• But a majority of men prefer to live in a capitalist country.

Why am I not surprised. Like so many other things women want men to pay for everything so they can have free shit.....

 

Remember that these standards only apply to the government. The government cannot restrict speech or the press.
Everyone else is free to do so, and historically has. This includes corporations.

 

They are like the bugs in Men In Black, surviving on chaos and carnage.

 

That was one sick puppy:
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019...ght-arrested-for-soliciting-child-sex-online/

If it is at all close to be true he needs to be put down, permanently.

 

Remember that it is also a value that enables the free exchange of ideas. Suppression leads to revolution.

 

Oh, I understand very well.

There continues to be a vast chasm between the rights you actually have and what most of us would agree is right and proper.

Individuals are a lot less restricted than our Federal and State governments when it comes to disinformation, obsfucation, and censorship.

Our “free press” has a long history of one-sided narrative. It’s only been in the radio/tv era that we’ve come to expect broadcast media to be impartial. There used to be a requirement for that called the Fairness Doctrine and Equal Time Rule. Those were both sent dormant in the 1980’s and were removed in the 1990’s.

All media are now free to engage in what used to be called yellow journalism.

It’s pretty sad, IMO

 

That’s why censorious behavior by what used to be open platforms is concerning, even if ultimately self-destructive.

 

The Fairness Doctrine was used to stifle speech.

https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/the-history-and-possible-revival-of-the-fairness-doctrine/

 

Nice troll, have a donut.

 

Nice counterpoint. So convincing.

 

Don't like facts?
The Fairness Doctrine was anti-free speech.
The lefties loved it because it was their tool
to suppress speech from the right.

 

One way to look at it.

Try another:
The broadcast airwaves are owned by the American People. They are licensed (leased) at no cost to individuals and corporations to operate, for profit, in the public interest, convenience, and necessity (from the Communications Act of 1934, and repeated in part from the Federal Radio Act of 1927).

In return for the free use of a public trust for profit-making activity, fairness in reporting on issues of the day was expected. The Fairness Doctrine was upheld by many courts over the years (see Red Lion)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine

The Fairness Doctrine did not limit free speech at all. It did limit one-sided examination of the issues of the day.

 

In fair application, the MSM should hate this doctrine.