And Trump holds no responsibility for inciting the reaction? That's golden. Actions have consequences. His actions -- both as candidate and now as POTUS --have been unprecedented.
No he doesn't. He hadn't actually DONE anything yet. And any rational person listening to what he said certainly had a right to disagree. The issue is to the extent that they go. The only two things "unprecedented" in my mind about what he has done since POTUS is that he has actually done SOMETHING this early in his presidency (other than going to balls, and giving apology speeches to other countries) and that he's making dumb tweets. Methinks there are villages all over missing their idiots as a result of the left and their out of bounds protests over things they can't even describe.
You mean the reaction that started immediately upon his election? Reaction to what people assume he is going to do rather than any words or actions he's actually taken? Because so far I'm not seeing anything he's done to limit Muslims, just people from countries with a lot of terrorists. He hasn't done or said anything about gay peeps or womens rights or anything else that was being protested about and reported that he "might" do in the media. Because those are the reports and reactions I'm talking about. The ones that were total lies by the public and media. Just like the lies about Obama by the birthers but this is a lot more widespread and across a lot more subjects. I agree some of the actions he's taken have been unprecedented. I like that part.
The point was that nothing was unprecedented in terms of the action itself. Only in that there was any action this early. Maybe you can't understand that?
Within two sentences, he hasn't done anything ....and he has done something. Not sure anymore what you're trying to say....
That's a bullshit statement. Look at all the other media (not even bringing Breitbart into it) compared in ratio to Fox. You know it's buillshit.
Media as a whole, and average of the sentiment if you will. On this one the anti Trump media far outnumbers the pro Trump peeps. Granted the liberal media far outnumbers the conservative but I don't even think it's that as much as they're all still so pissed off at the cosmos that they got it wrong. They all truly thought Hillary had it. I've also seen a change - albeit slight - in the attitude of the national news peeps about Trump. They're still super negative in how they word every story tease about him but within the stories they're starting to actually report on things he's said or done that were right or worked.
You're being deliberately (I think) obtuse. Pretend its crayons. The only thing UNPRECEDENTED that he's done is the fact that he has done ANYTHING this early in a Presidency.
What in the world does unprecedented have to do with anything? You - "He hadn't actually DONE anything yet." You again - "he has actually done SOMETHING this early in his presidency" I get the slam at Obama doing nothing and all that but you seriously said in the same paragraph he's done nothing and he's done something. Precedence has absolutely nothing to do with what you said
You really should go back and read what you typed before the edit window closes on posts like this one
Wait a sec - in the hadn't done part - were you referring to when campaigning and then you swapped over to post election for the rest of it? I think I get the confusion on both sides.