A reporter has been going to his house. She reports that his family says they can't talk because of a gag order. She also says there are armed guards around the house. Some reporter in NV.
Or he got paid big for an exclusive and the others are still bugging him. Still not actually missing.
Which, in my mind, could be enough for him to not be found again either. If this guy doesn't turn up, it may very well be because he's a liability and not because of some greater conspiracy around the shooting itself.
if stories are accurate (which, who knows?) he cannot be found by his union, his employer, or the media. Additionally, somebody with deep pockets has surrounded the guys house with armed security and it’s not the union or Mandalay
Not the union or Mandalay says who? Or why couldn't it be the popo? Or whatever/whoever paid for his exclusive story? Which could be anyone from a specific media outlet to movie makers or book publishers. The possibilities of why the one reporter is seeing what they are are pretty endless.
Conspiracy theorists be like: "No evidence of a conspiracy just means the coverup was very thorough!"
And then there are those who believe there are no conspiracies, and for whom no evidence would suffice. Complete suspension of disbelief is not a positive characteristic either. Occam's Razor is not an absolute.
Well the current listing of degenerates is Dem heavy, so I can see where that could be a conflict. Don't give up, your chance will come eventually.
I was offered that chance yesterday when voting in the Boulder City Council election. 9 candidate. All Dems. I had no choice but to vote along completely superficial lines of a single issue (the ongoing war with Xcel over electric muni conversion). There were several asks for tax increases, extensions of existing taxes, and requests for changes to rules binding the behavior council members. I just voted no on all of it. I figure the good squads will be here by Monda.