Kind of figured that. Well again, hope I dont run into you and need some help ...but if i run into you and you need help, i would help you.
Respectfully, I did read what you wrote and I’m trying to understand how you see “that scenario” differs from others. You agree that the woman had a major role in her unborn child’s death. As I said, I can’t point to any crime where someone has won. If you can find one for me, please do. You state that your rational for believing she shouldn’t be charged is because “no one wins” even though you believe she had a hand in the child’s death. If you’ve believe that the others should be prosecuted even though no one wins in those scenarios, what is it about this one that makes it special? I will point out that the case was dropped only after there was “national outrage”. Who exactly was outraged? The people that believe it’s okay to kill innocent babies but not okay to kill convicted murders, those people ? That’s getting things 180 backwards, don’t you think ?
Damn, so much hate. I will still try to help you and tell you that's not a good idea. You really dont like me do you?
I get the impression that Jase is actually a good guy. He is simply unable to see the world from any viewpoint other than his own. We all share this trait to some degree, but Jase could safely stare into the sun with his blinders.
Apparently SF has banned travel to Alabama. So if y'all are visiting and see a turd on the side walk the dog really did do it.
Additionally, it only impacts them when flying for official business. They can still go where they want for vacation and to visit family. Most likely it will have very little impact on SC or Alabama. More likely it will either save the CA taxpayers some money as the officials don't really need to be there or it will hurt their city if they really do need to be there. It isn't like Alabama or SC are hotbeds for conferences anyway.
California, if you are listening, I double dog dare you to forbid any resident of your state to visit Alabama.