Notre Dame Fire

So it was them evil Muslims and if they say it was something else they're just lying?

You are so far off the deep end it's become a little scary.

Quite simply looking at the first footage of the fire it most likely started at the base of the spire - not exactly an easy place to haul a bunch of flammable terrorist materials to in the middle of a work day with workers all around. The only logical conclusion right now is it was a screw up by a worker. No conspiracy theories are remotely necessary.

As for defense - of course they did so preemptively, there is an absolute shit ton of stupidity out there looking to blame them for everything even if it's ridiculous to do so with no evidence...

 

If they talked to the workers who said what we were doing started the fire and we couldn't put it out it's not real hard to investigate...

 

I admire skills like were used to build it - especially factoring in the lack of tech at the time.

I am curious why people don't expect the Pope to pull out a checkbook though, it's his building after all.

 

Got any sources other than a random tweet of some other random video?

 

Huh. Can't imagine the church giving anything away although if they got a deal where they still used it for nothing and the French paid all the repairs it makes sense.

 

No. I posted an obvious example of how they could easily be done investigating in response to your post about how they couldn't be. Like you I have no idea how it started. Logically it was construction related based on where it started but that is still just a guess at this point.

 

Oh hell yeah.

 

Did I say mine has more credence? Maybe you're seeing that your conclusion jump was a little premature?

There is a lot of bad shit in Europe and Paris sure, but doesn't change that the fire starting at the spire - on top of and in the center of the church about as far as you can get from doors, right where workers were working on a lead roof - makes it much much less likely to be terrorism and much more likely to be an accident. Is that what happened? Hell if I know, I'm sitting at a computer in Georgia and not a fire inspector to begin with. But it's more likely than the other theories just based on the tiny handful of facts we do have.

Still a moot point in that you said they couldn't have drawn a conclusion yet - I gave an example of how they could have done do and pointed out that your post had no merit. That's all. Not remotely saying I know what happened any more than you do, just that your post was wrong.

 

I was merely talking about my opinion vs XFBO's - I absolutely totally am 100% positive my opinion has more credence than your conspiracy theory - especially one where you've already ruled out believing any other reasons for the fire being possible or believable. So yeah, with regard to your post, I am absolutely sure that you are wrong.

 

Yeah, kind of amazing lightning hasn't taken the roof out before now.