WTF? I’ve come to the realization that these people honestly believe that NO rules apply to them, even the laws of nature and natural order.
Can guys use this with periods? I dont consent to a woman being rude to me just because she is bleeding.
This could prove to have some very interesting ramifications. There's many that speculate that the TRUE statistics on paternity fraud are much higher than the experts will admit to. Understandable seeing as how it could up-end the stability of a good number of families. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...dads-left-shock-DIY-paternity-tests-soar.html "AlphaBiolabs, the leading British home test supplier, says up to 30,000 paternity tests are being performed in this country every year – and that the figures are rising by ten per cent per year. ‘Of these, around 20 percent of men will learn they are not the father of the child they are testing,’ says the company’s director, David Thomas. He added that in some regions the figure is higher, including the North East, where it is 30 percent." This aligns with some of those stats that nearly 1 in 3 dads is caring for a child that is (generally unbeknownst to them) not theirs.
I suppose that is worse than finding out you're banging your half sister... https://www.reddit.com/r/tifu/comments/af5h58/tifu_by_finding_out_ive_been_accidentally_dating/
It isn't the bleeding that makes us fall to pieces - its non-consensual hormones. Men have a DAILY hormone surge - what do we get out of the deal for having to put up with crabby assholes at peak times of the day?
https://www.mediaite.com/online/cnn...r-white-privilege-webb-informs-her-hes-black/ "You got where you are because of white privilege" "Uhm, I'm black."
In the thread they discuss the physical genetic repercussions if they were to actually have children together. Nobody seemed to really give a damn about the "moral" dilemma, because of their upbringing/history (or lack thereof) and such.
This can't be the first time that has happened. My wife was adopted. She found her birth family in ~2005. Turns out, her mother & father stayed together & had 2 more kids after her, both boys, both 100% full siblings to her. They stayed in the same small Texas town as the adoption took place in. Comparing stories of places they'd gone, schools they attended, etc., they had to have seen one another hundreds of times. She and her oldest little brother were 2 years apart in the same small town school system. They were eating in the same cafeteria for two years at lunch in high school. They never knew one another, and ran in different circles, but they did have common friends/acquaintances. How big of a stretch would it have been for one of those acquaintances to say, "You know, you and so-and-so look a lot alike. You have so much in common. you should go out."?
I haven't seen anyone own themselves that hard since Jim Acosta stood beside a border wall and basically proved it works and is a good idea, despite his narrative against such. I keep telling myself they can't be this stupid, yet they prove daily that they are so.
I'm not sure you understood my question... It sounds like their primary goal with this test was so they could find out who their "biological dad" (aka sperm donor) was... my question is, who gives a shit? Why do you want to find out which dude jerked it into a cup so they could impregnate your mom?