OK, now you've done the same thing as Trump. You've set fire to the table when you provided waaaay to much information.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/scaramucci-says-split-with-priebus-may-not-bereparable-1501172308 Trump can't even run his office properly let alone the country. It's just sad commentary that being able to run a twitter account effectively is all it takes to fool enough people. He appoints, praises, and "executes" his own people at a rate that would make a dictator blush.
You do realize that the staff serve at the pleasure of the President? If he fires someone, that doesn't mean that he "can't even run his office properly" . It means they weren't doing their job to his satisfaction. Every President has fired staff, it may be that you're just used to scandles preceding the "resignations" from the last 8 years.
If you were to run a division of my company and made a habit of firing your own chosen new hires within 6 months, I would fire you for being an ineffective leader. Thats a waste of time and money and indicates you have poor judgement - especially if you descibed each and every one as being "tremendous" while making your case for bringing them onboard.
I'd have to look them up to be accurate. Off the top of my head, there was a general, VA, transportation(?), Obamacare roll out, can't remember her name. Flynn
This is the way the world works. There are positions where you either perform from go, or you get replaced. How many has Trump fired at this point? In high level positions?
So far, if I remember right, the only one that has raised a stink is Comey. The speculation is that he may fire Sessions next. The funny thing about that case is that Trump is pissed because Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation. It appears that Trump is not educated enough to understand that Sessions had no choice since he was part of Trump's campaign group during the election cycle. I believe it's illegal for Sessions to be a part of the investigation against himself. Of course, we must not forget Trump's firing of several Federal prosecutors. A couple of them were involved in an investigation concerning actions taken by Trump himself. Sure does look like Trump is involved in interference of a Federal investigation against himself. "Ready, Aim, fire. OH Hell, I shot my frigging foot again."
Obama to replace U.S. Attorneys Politico 05/15/2009 Trump team ousts Obama-appointed U.S. attorneys Politico 03/10/2017 ATTORNEY GENERAL SEEKS RESIGNATIONS FROM PROSECUTORS NYT 03/24/1993 Clinton fires 93 federal prosecutors appointed by Bush. All Presidents purge the federal attornies from the previous administration. There's nothing there, again. Please name the prosecutors that were investigating Trump and what they were investigating that you seem to think points to evil-doing.
Let me guess - you're quoting from information sources that you derided hours earlier because Libtards only respond to their own source material. . . Or was it some sort of psychological multidimensional chess move to show the obvious passes that Obama and Clinton got from the ultra left wing MSM when they did the same as Trump? What's really perplexing is do you consider what you linked real or fake? Maybe all this confusion you're experiencing is because you can't even stay in front of the bullshit you're trying to convince yourself of for less than 12 hours?
It was obviously to show the difference in reporting. It's just that simple. There's no chess game involved. Only people unfamiliar with the news over a period of decades bought into the "fake news" bullshit. Congratulations on being one of them. Nothing has changed of late. There has always been slanted news, poorly written news and just plain wrong news. "Fake news" is just one more of the constructs churned out by the Clinton camp to create a smokescreen for the fact she was losing. It's another place to lay blame for her failure, along with the non-existent Russian connection. Pure misdirection. What I linked is opinionated and slanted. And the confusion seems to be yours. I'm steadily holding the same position. Your position, however, is stated nowhere in your diatribe. You don't seem to have a point of any kind, so what is the purpose of your questions?