Federal Judge Strikes Down Federal Interstate Handgun Transfer Ban

It is definitely time to start looking at this. Maybe this M855 ban attempt will be the catalyst. I love how that the harder they have pushed the last few years, we have countered and actually gained back more of our rights than before they started pushing. It's not working out so well for the anti-civil rights folks...keep pushing m'fers...we keep winning. (with a few slave states being the exception)

 

The DEVIL made you write that!!!

 

And so it begins.....(again)........when Hillary gets in just wait and see....

https://www.yahoo.com/news/court-no-carry-concealed-weapons-public-175139817.html

 

Assholes sure don't believe in the constitution. She CAN'T be elected. That would be a disaster!

 

The California case began in 2009, when Edward Peruta filed a legal challenge over the San Diego County sheriff's refusal to issue him a permit. Peruta said at the time he wanted a weapon to protect himself, but the sheriff said he needed a better reason, such as that his occupation exposes him to robbery.

What pathetic zombies the democrats have become.

 

"celebrities who fear for their safety"

But not the poor janitors who lives in a crap neighborhood, some animals are more equal.

 

If you believe in the 2nd amendment and your right to self defense and you pull the lever for Clinton, you deserve to lose that right and many, many others (and you WILL lose them under her thumb). NOTHING is a greater risk to freedom right now than the multiple SCOTUS picks that will happen over the next term.

 

Since this issue has been covered by the Supreme Court already I'm wondering how a lessor court can rule differently from what the SC has already ruled. It's going to be interesting to see what happens.

Another concern that keeps cropping up in California is how the leaders of parts of that state cannot seem to understand the ramifications of their own actions. Now the leaders of San Francisco, in opposition to Trump's seemingly racist slant toward illegals, are hoping that this next election will result in voting rights for illegals. Are these people just not thinking very far down the road or, are they just dumb?

http://freebeacon.com/politics/san-francisco-trump-voting/

 

Because the Supreme Court has NOT ruled on this issue. The decision in Heller set the floor, but did not rule on what kinds of state regulations might be permissible.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/06/09/carrying-guns-in-public-a-primer/

 

100% correct.....the best part???

That language is coming from the very people who CLAIM to be for working class folks......they can try to paint the same old tired picture that wealthy Republicans are the arrogant uppity problems of this nation but the truth will always be right under their noses. White privilege and ELITISM plagues the Democrat Party...it has been since the '40's and will continue to do so.

You guys catch the meme's this week on Clinton wearing a $12k blouse while giving her fake ass rant on income inequality???
They've become so brazen and arrogant enough to not even think the imbecilic sheeple in their audiences would even notice or understand the irony. You couldn't make this shit up.

 

From Forbes....

Apparently the 9th cited old English law to support their unconstitutional ruling.

"This Ninth Circuit decision then declares that “[t]o the degree that the English Bill of Rights is an interpretive guide to our Second Amendment, the critical question is the meaning of the phrase ‘as allowed by law.’”


They then cite Heller and say: [W]ith respect to the case now before us, the specific question is whether the arms that are ‘allowed by law’ – that is, the arms Protestants had the right to bear – included concealed firearms. The history just recounted demonstrates that carrying concealed firearms in public was not ‘allowed by law.’ Not only was it generally prohibited by the statute of Northampton, but it was specifically forbidden by the statute enacted under Henry VIII, and by later proclamations of Elizabeth I and James I.”


This isn’t just a judicial leap, but it’s a stupendous leap into a body of law from a country we won our independence from thanks to arms owned and carried by the people. Arms that included handguns stuffed into the pockets of overcoats."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/frankmi...ed-carry-gun-ruling-is-nonsense/#7041af4238b9

 

It's the 9th circuit.
They have a long and storied history of shit like this.

 

Fuck "English Law".... And anyone who thinks we should abide.

 

Spot on. The only thing I can add is that it's really not an option to sit this one out or throw your vote away in protest of a candidate that you don't like. I don't like trump...but for the reasons you said above, there is simply no other option and if we don't put him in office, we are fucking doomed. Clinton is hell bent on eradicating the Bill of Rights and it starts with the 2nd and 1st amendments. This is tyranny folks.

 

You're probably right since issues like this will continue to be argued all the way down to the details of what color shoes a firearm carrier wears while carrying. The SC will end up having to decide all of them.

 

Yep 'shall not be infringed' seems to confuse them.

 

Correct and when the sea hag takes Office, she'll be the one to be fill the current vacancy and the potential TWO future ones that will most likely happen in the next 4 yrs. Ooooo Yeaaa........so those residing in swing States, don't vote or vote for your 3rd or 4th party candidates.....shit should get funny in the near future. Fck it.

 

Making lots of folks instant criminals...

 

What would happen if these same 'requirements' were placed on other constitutional rights? Would people even care that you might 'really really need' your 5th Amendment rights? Or that you have to show a 'need' for the freedom of speech to disagree with the president in public?

These morons should be arrested and tried for treason! I just dont understand how you can cite british law when it comes to american rights.

 

Because that is the shit thinking they teach in "Prominent Colleges" these days.....