LOL! Have a bit too much coffee? LOL! I was just asking calmly...there was no tone in my post. Relax. LMAO! But thanks for answering.
Using your "logic" none of it's factual since none of us were directly involved in any of it so you're absolutely correct, it is not a fact nor is anything else I posted. So sorry to have wasted your time.
You were asking calmly and so was I. I'm still wondering, why would you trust someone who is hiding behind a fake name?
Maybe he's actually a nice guy? Nah, you determined on page two that whoever LNBY was accusing was in the wrong.
Honeslty i DO NOT HAVE IT! I could not tell you. Its been well over a year. Seriously. Im am sure ill get it (my attorneys will as well) from Cliff later today.
Post #406 both the quoted and response in their entirety are the only true statements so far. And neither one address the basic issue at hand.
The basic issue is this and only this; Was the motor that the OP blew up at Daytona the same motor that EDR built? I can't answer that based on any of the information so far. Can anyone else?
Really? Okay. Why would I? I never said I trusted that person. But if you meant generally speaking then IDK. I can't speak for everyone but I think one of the reasons MAY be there are a lot of dumb@$$ posses out there who may take one's name and use it for ill purposes/intentions/slander etc. IDK. Let me beat you guys to it: Sorta like what the OP is doing to the shop? I guess but they actually have history. I was just curious what credibility/background had anything to do with one's accusation being valid. Again, you guys don't know me. Even if I posted my name does that give me credibility? No. So obviously most long term members/posses will side with the shop.
I was being general but I am curious specifically why you feel we should trust someone who refuses to say who they are. I get the dumbasses might do stupid stuff, but the privacy issue could have easily been handled with an email to me. He managed to do that immediately after he was banned oddly enough. Long term membership does of course help here but really doesn't mean anything if you've got a valid complaint. In this case he's complaining about the shop without providing any proof the shop had a single thing to do with the sale. If he'd come here bitching about Cliff I could totally get it, but he's slamming EDR which makes no sense.
I could careless if the OP posted his real name or not. If his accusation which what you're addressing towards the bottom of your post was presented in a more factual way then that is all that matters. But banning him for not providing his name wasn't really the issue. It was more or less how he presented the facts. I do agree if you're going to accuse someone in public be prepared to answer questions and even go as far to provide proof when asked. Name? Has no bearing to me. But if that's the rule here then so be it.
Please, STFU you keep posting the same thing. You told us you were done posting. Get a life! OR get in the same room w/ all party"s involved so you can keep from making assumptions!