Actually, he didn't, but for the sake of argument, let's say the quid pro quo you claim happened had actually occurred. Where's the crime? What law would Trump have broken?
OK well the Been has a different view than the rest of the world. But if you were so clear and obvious why the need to release a clarifying statement. BUT OK
What is the wrong-doing by withholding aid to ensure the corruption investigation was being conducted, other countries are paying their fair share, or with investigating the DNC server hacking? It is a quid quo pro for the country. Remember, the media/dems pushed for the Russia Meddling investigation and now are crying because Trump has done the same thing. Doesn't matter what the WH admins say, the media will take it out of context or twist the wording. Mulvaney speaks slightly better than Trump but is still a confusing speaker. Show us exactly where the bad man touch you in the transcript. https://www.rev.com/blog/mick-mulva...pt-get-over-it-regarding-ukraine-quid-pro-quo
It's actually required by law to do this, Mulvaney is supposed to do that. This is why he had no problem telling the press what was done. But, OMB. RESIST!!
CITE said law. And if that's the case why walk it back hrs later? Let see if Nm steps down pretty soon DMW!!!
Are you kidding me? Yes, the hacking and the way it was handled by the FBI is just another cog in the corruption wheel leading to Strzok, Comey, Etc. Selective focus you have there, still haven’t shown where Mulvaney dropped the ball.
Who knows if they were really even hacked vs a leak. The only evidence was the word of someone paid by the DNC. The FBI never examined any evidence nor did any other law enforcement organization. Further if it was hacked who knows the perpetrator, could have been Russia could have been script kiddies. The result was WikiLeaks but if they are to be believed it was not Russia. So it is kind of hard to care since the DNC was in cover up mode about whatever did happen.
According to some guys who checked the metadata the information given to Wikileaks was downloaded to a thumb drive and not hacked over the internet.
Yeah im still lost on why they didn't want to Fbi to examine their servers, what was there that they were scared to come out.
And then there are a few families that have made their money prior to entering politics. Unlike just about everyone with a 'D' by their names.
So what you're saying is, the documents were downloaded via thumb drive and that thumb drive was then mailed to Wiki leaks? That would also mean each time those files changed hands it was the original Usb being used to access the file. That sounds too simple in something like this. Plus Metadata is easily faked
If that's your take on it, then you and I are not living in remotely the same version of reality. Perhaps it's time to put down the crack pipe and/or stop watching Rachel Madcow.