I believe it would have to fall under Impeachment rules, pretty much like the Presidency. In other words, forget it.
Would be a terrible idea as well. Anything you do will be done to you. Just ask all those that supported Reid nuking the filibuster.
Agreed. If she gets to the point where she really can't ever come back into the chambers to discuss / argue one would hope she would resign at the point or it might be time to push her along. I know she is away now, but she is expected to return.
Odd, I didn't read anything in that article about him not being in chambers. Nor was there anything about him not participating in person for the discussions the justices have behind closed doors after they have heard the cases. Your apple is not an orange. I also said, and "can't ever come back to the chambers". He returned. So your banana is not an orange either.
Why does every article from the NYT say I’ve reached my limit? I don’t ever go there unless it’s a link on this site, maybe once or twice a month. BS.
I reached my limit on NYT loooooong ago. If I see it's on their site, I won't click it. They're not even fit for fishwrap/birdcage lining anymore. Their internet presence is an utter waste of electrons.
I hope he appoints one of the migrants from the recent Mexican cross country adventure. The Dems would throw qualification out the window faster than a pack of dogs on a 3 legged cat to get that person on the bench!
In all seriousness (is that even possible with this crowd...? ), does anyone think that RBG is down for the count?