2021 is that the year you will finally come out of the closet...... you are a dumbass and I feel sorry for anybody that knows you. join the jealous?? club of american
Am I the only one that noticed that the "performance" information he posted actually states that the New Reed made less torque and no more HP at all? Edit: I almost forgot join the jealous?? club of american
Did the article ""New Reed" posted in a previous post say Barry Holtzman was the inventor? http://www.snowtechmagazine.com/articles/2001/eid/eid.php I wonder what he would think of "New Reed" speaking about his product and this thread? http://www.holtzmaneng.com/ [email protected] Anyone want to email him and find out, maybe he can join the fun.
It is certainly true that at some speeds and throttle openings all engines both two and four cycle will produce intake flow reversion, that is actual direction reversal of incoming airflow. This is different than wave reversion that you hint at when sound, not air, reverses direction from either a closed or open end of a pipe or duct. This reversion sound wave in the two stroke actually increases the total airflow into the engine at peak power speeds as the soundwave heads back to the carb opening in response to the closing of the intake as a pressure pulse but because of the clever "bell" shaped end of the caruburetor it changes sign and creates a reversion or low pressure pulse that adds to the incoming charge impetus. I believe that radial reed when mentioning less "reversion" is really implying that his device has less air, not wave, backflow and therefore increases the total air volume or "trapped" air in the crankcase at the end of the intake cycle. My comment was that at peak engine speed with the reversion wave effects of the intake and exhaust systems that very little air backflow in the intake track acutally does occur. This is not to say that as I mentioned before that at other than peak power speeds reversion does not occur.